The 2 bigger remaining tasks are:
1. handling prices for variants
2. Handling options (breaking change)
After that all tests should pass on both v1 and v2
In this PR:
1. I added upsert support for the product
2. I updated the create and update signatures to match the latest interface standards
3. Small changes to make the v1 and v2 APIs compatible (WIP)
### What
Add workflow for refreshing a payment collection.
The idea is that on all cart updates, we want two things to happen (in the context of payments) 1. the currently active payment sessions should be destroyed, and 2. the payment collection should be updated with the new cart total.
We do this to ensure that we always collect the correct payment amount.
From a customer perspective, this would mean that every time something on the cart is updated, the customer would need to enter their payment details anew.
To me, this is a good tradeoff to avoid inconsistencies with payment collection.
Additionally, I updated the Payment Module interface with `upsert` and `updated` following our established convention.
### Note
This PR depends on a fix to the `remoteJoiner` that @carlos-r-l-rodrigues is working on.
Update: Fix merged in #6602
Co-authored-by: Adrien de Peretti <25098370+adrien2p@users.noreply.github.com>
This implementation obviously lacks a lot of things, and there are a lot of TODOs. However, there are already a lot of questions I'd rather get answered soon, so I figured it's much easier to do the implementation in steps.
I wrote down all breaking changes, suggested changes, and new additions with comments (TODO and Note).
In a follow-up PR I will:
Add the remaining/missing models
Make the workflows handle all interactions between the different models/modules
Add integration tests
~~Opening a draft PR to discuss a couple of implementation details that we should align on~~
**What**
Add workflow and API endpoint for creating payment sessions for a payment collection. Endpoint is currently `POST /store/payment-collection/:id/payment-sessions`. I suggested an alternative in a comment below.
Please note, we intentionally do not want to support creating payment sessions in bulk, as this would become a mess when having to manage multiple calls to third-party providers.
**What**
Adds endpoints to manage tax rules on a tax rate:
- Create a tax rule: POST /admin/tax-rates/:id/rules
- Delete a tax rule: DELETE /admin/tax-rates/:id/rules/:rule_id
- Replace tax rules: POST /admin/tax-rates/:id -- with { rules: [...] } in body.
### Noteworthy things I bumped into
**Updating nested relationships**
A TaxRate can have multiple TaxRules and in this PR we enable users to replace all TaxRules associated with a TaxRate in one operation. If working with the module directly this can be done with:
```javascript
taxModuleService.update(rateId, { rules: [{ ... }] })
```
Internally in the `update` function the TaxModule first soft deletes any TaxRules that exist on the TaxRate and then creates new TaxRules for the passed rules ([see test](https://github.com/medusajs/medusa/pull/6557/files#diff-cdcbab80ac7928b80648088ec57a3ab09dddd4409d6afce034f2caff08ee022bR78)).
A challenge arises when doing this in a compensatable way in a workflow. To see this imagine the following:
1. `updateTaxRatesWorkflow` gets the current data for the tax rates to update. This includes the tax rates' rules.
2. `updateTaxRatesWorkflow` calls `taxModuleService.update` with new rules.
3. Internally, the tax module deletes the rules in 1. and creates new rules.
4. Imagine an error happens in a following step and the workflow has to compensate.
5. The workflow uses the data from 1. and calls upsert. The tax module may correctly update the previous tax rules so they are no longer soft deleted. However, upsert (at least not by default) doesn't delete the new rules that were created in 2.
As illustrated by 5. compensating the update is not pretty. To get around this I instead opted to let the workflow handle setting the rules for a rate that makes the compensation more straightforward to handle. [See workflow here](https://github.com/medusajs/medusa/pull/6557/files#diff-ff19e1f2fa32289aefff90d33c05c154f9605a3c5da6a62683071a1fcaedfd7bR89).
**Using nested workflows**
Initially, I wanted to use the `setTaxRateRulesWorkflow` within the `updateTaxRatesWorkflow`. And this worked great for the invoke phase. However, when I needed to compensate the update workflow (and hence also had to compensate the set rules workflow), I found that the workflow engine no longer had the set rules transaction in memory and therefore could not roll it back. ([This is where I try to rollback](https://github.com/medusajs/medusa/pull/6557/files#diff-ff19e1f2fa32289aefff90d33c05c154f9605a3c5da6a62683071a1fcaedfd7bR62), but the transaction id can't be found).
I therefore opted to copy the steps from the set tax rate rules workflow into the update tax rates workflow; however, once we figure out a good way to ensure we can compensate nested workflows we should move to the nested workflow instead.
This also made me realize that the current implementation of workflows that use `refreshCartPromotions` may create inconsistencies in case of failures (cc: @riqwan).
what:
- add util to transform get response to an update request
RESOLVES CORE-1687
Given an update data object, we can infer the `fields` and `selects` of a data object using a util we already have - `getSelectsAndRelationsFromObjectArray`. Using the `fields` and `selects`, we can call either the module `retrieve` or `list` method to get a snapshot of the data down to its exact attributes. We can pass this data into the revert step.
In the revert step, we just need to convert the snapshot received from `retrieve` or `list` to a shape that the `update` methods will accept. The util that is introduced in this PR aims to do exactly that, so that the revert step looks as simple as:
```
const { snapshotData, selects, relations } = revertInput
await promotionModule.updateCampaigns(
convertItemResponseToUpdateRequest(snapshotData, selects, relations)
)
```
entity before update:
```
Campaign: {
id: "campaign-test-1",
name: "test campaign",
budget: {
total: 2000
},
promotions: [{ id: "promotion-1" }],
rules: [
{ id: "rule-1", operator: "gt", value: "10" }
]
}
```
This is how the util will transform the data for different types of attributes in the object:
simple attributes:
```
invoke:
{
id: "campaign-test-1",
name: "change name",
}
compensate:
{
id: "test-1",
name: "test campaign"
}
```
one to one relationship:
```
invoke:
{
id: "campaign-test-1",
budget: { total: 4000 }
}
compensate:
{
id: "campaign-test-1",
budget: { total: 2000 }
}
```
one to many / many to many relationship:
```
invoke:
{
id: "campaign-test-1",
promotions: [{ id: "promotion-2" }]
rules: [
{ id: "rule-1", operator: "gt", value: "20" },
{ operator: "gt", value: "20" }
]
}
compensate:
{
id: "campaign-test-1",
promotions: [{ id: "promotion-1" }]
rules: [{ id: "rule-1", operator: "gt", value: "20" }]
}
```
all together:
```
invoke:
{
id: "campaign-test-1",
name: "change name",
promotions: [{ id: "promotion-2" }],
budget: { total: 4000 },
rules: [
{ id: "rule-1", operator: "gt", value: "20" },
{ operator: "gt", value: "20" }
]
}
compensate:
{
id: "test-1",
name: "test campaign",
promotions: [{ id: "promotion-1" }],
budget: { total: 2000 },
rules: [{ id: "rule-1", operator: "gt", value: "20" }],
}
```
**What**
- Add support for creating a cart with items
- Add endpoint `POST /store/carts/:id/line-items`
- Add `CreateCartWorkflow`
- Add `AddToCartWorkflow`
- Add steps for both workflows
**Testing**
- Endpoints
- Workflows
I would still call this a first iteration, as we are missing a few pieces of the full flow, such as payment sessions, discounts, and taxes.
Co-authored-by: Adrien de Peretti <25098370+adrien2p@users.noreply.github.com>
what:
- adds API + workflow to add/remove promotions in a cart
- minor fixes in promotions module
- minor type fixes in cart module
- typing fix in workflows-sdk (Thanks @adrien2p)
- fix step result in workflows-sdk (Thanks @adrien2p)
RESOLVES CORE-1768
Co-authored-by: Adrien de Peretti <25098370+adrien2p@users.noreply.github.com>
**What**
Add missing support for updating countries on the POST /admin/regions/:id route.
Furthermore, the PR refactors how the normalization and validation was handled in both create and update scenarios.
Finally, the PR adds a unique index on the country entity, which ensures at the DB level that we cannot have a duplicate country in the DB for a single region.
**What**
Add `POST /admin/regions`
Add `POST /admin/regions/:id`
Add `DELETE /admin/regions/:id`
All are added for v2 using API Routes and workflows.
In follow-up PRs, I will add support for passing countries in update and create.
Update: First follow-up PR is #6372
**What**
- add accept invite endpoint
**Invite accept flow**
- authenticate using the auth endpoint to create and auth-user
- invoke accept endpoint with token and info to create user
**What**
- remove auth provider entity
**Why**
- The auth provider entity was not really used anywhere
**How**
- Keeping loader behavior as is but removing the
Co-authored-by: Sebastian Rindom <7554214+srindom@users.noreply.github.com>
