## Summary
**What** — What changes are introduced in this PR?
Avoid creating reservations when draft order edits are confirmed and rather, create them when the draft order is converted into a regular order.
**Why** — Why are these changes relevant or necessary?
While the order is a draft, creating reservations would potentially block inventory for regular order requests, when the draft represents a non materialized state of a purchase that might never be completed or at a latter point in time.
**How** — How have these changes been implemented?
Removed the reservation creations inside of `confirmDraftOrderEditWorkflow` and instead do it inside `convertDraftOrderWorkflow`
**Testing** — How have these changes been tested, or how can the reviewer test the feature?
Added integration tests.
---
## Examples
Provide examples or code snippets that demonstrate how this feature works, or how it can be used in practice.
This helps with documentation and ensures maintainers can quickly understand and verify the change.
```ts
// Example usage
```
---
## Checklist
Please ensure the following before requesting a review:
- [x] I have added a **changeset** for this PR
- Every non-breaking change should be marked as a **patch**
- To add a changeset, run `yarn changeset` and follow the prompts
- [x] The changes are covered by relevant **tests**
- [x] I have verified the code works as intended locally
- [x] I have linked the related issue(s) if applicable
---
## Additional Context
Add any additional context, related issues, or references that might help the reviewer understand this PR.
fixes#13773
closes SUP-2523
* feat: carry over promotions toggle on exchanges
* fix: inital flag value, return the flag on preview
* fix: validation of allocation type
* fix: revert client changes
* fix: invert condition
* feat: recompute adjustments when outbound item is updated
* fix: condition again
* fix: display more accurate inbound/outbound totals for exchanges
* fix: make exchanges specs green
* feat: more testing cases
* wip: pr feedback
* fix: use plural for the flag on Admin
* fix: schema test, route refactor
* feat: tooltip
* feat: refactor to use update workflow
* feat: display applied promotion per item on order details, show copy sku on hover
* feat: refactor edits and exchanges to have common flag toggle flow
* fix: delete empty file
* fix: exchange_id param query
* Lock markFulfillmentAsDeliveredWorkflow with fulifllment id
* Lock markOrderFulfillmentAsDeliveredWorkflow by orderId before calling markFulfillmentAsDeliveredWorkflow
* Add changeset
* wip
* add wip
* wip
* reuse action
* finish first draft
* fix tests
* cleanup
* Only compute adjustments when necessary
* Create hot-carrots-look.md
* address comments
* minor tweaks
* fix pay col
* fix test
* wip
* Dwip
* wip
* fix: adjustment typo
* fix: import
* fix: workflow imports
* wip: update test
* feat: upsert versioned adjustments when previewing order
* fix: revert unique codes change
* fix: order spec test with versioning
* wip: save
* feat: make adjustments work for preview and confirm flow, wip base repo filtering of older version adjustments
* fix: missing populate where
* wip: populate where loading versioned adjustments
* fix: filter out older adjustment versions
* temp: comment adjustments in repo
* test: add adjustment if no version
* wip: configure populate where in order base repository
* fix: rm manual filtering
* fix: revert base repo changes
* fix: revert
* fix: use order item version instead of order version
* fix: rm only in test
* fix: update case spec
* fix: remove sceanrio, wip test with draft promotion
* feat: test correct adjustments when disabling promotion
* feat: complex test case
* feat: test consecutive order edits
* feat: 2 promotions test case with a fixed promo
* feat: migrate existing order line item adjustments to order items latest version
* feat: update dep after merge
* wip: load adjustments separatley
* feat: adjustments collections
* fix: spread result, handle related entity case
* fix: update lock
* feat: make sure version is loaded, refactor, handle related entity case
* fix: check fields
* feat: loading adjustments for list and count
* fix: correct items version field
* fix: rm empty array
* fix: wip order modules spec
* fix: order module specs
* feat: preinit items adjustments
* fix: rm only
* fix: rm only
* chore: cleanup
* fix: migration files
* fix: dont change formatting
* fix: core package build
* chore: more cleanup
* fix: item update util
* fix: duplicate import
* fix: refresh adjustments for exchanges (#13992)
* wip: exchange adjustments
* feat: test - receive items
* feat: finish test case
* fix: casing
* fix(draft-orders, core-flows, orders) refresh adjustments for draft orders (#14025)
* wip: draft orders adjustments refresh
* feat: rewrite to use REPLACE action + test
* fix: rm only
* feat: cleanup old REPLACE actions
* feat: cleanup adjustemnts when 0 promotions
* wip: canceling draft order
* fix: make version arg optional
* fix: restore promotion links
* feat: test reverting on cancelation
* fix: address comments in tests
* wip: fix summary on preview
* fix: get pending diff on preview summary from total
* fix: revert pending diff change
---------
Co-authored-by: fPolic <mainacc.polic@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Frane Polić <16856471+fPolic@users.noreply.github.com>
## Summary
**What** —
Add a providerData field to notifications
**Why** —
We need the ability to pass dynamic fields to specific providers. E.g. CC and BCC for emails
**How** —
Just adding the field to the model
**Testing** —
Added the field to existing tests
## Checklist
Please ensure the following before requesting a review:
- [x] I have added a **changeset** for this PR
- Every non-breaking change should be marked as a **patch**
- To add a changeset, run `yarn changeset` and follow the prompts
- [x] The changes are covered by relevant **tests**
- [x] I have verified the code works as intended locally
- [ ] I have linked the related issue(s) if applicable
---
> [!NOTE]
> Adds `provider_data` to notifications (types, workflow input, DB model/migration) and forwards it in the Medusa Cloud Email provider, with tests updated accordingly.
>
> - **Data/Schema**:
> - Add `provider_data` (`jsonb`) to `notification` model and DB via migration `Migration20251121150408` and snapshot update.
> - **Types/DTOs**:
> - Add optional `provider_data` to `CreateNotificationDTO`, `NotificationDTO`, and `ProviderSendNotificationDTO`.
> - **Workflows**:
> - Extend `send-notifications` step input with `provider_data`.
> - **Providers**:
> - Medusa Cloud Email: include `provider_data` in outgoing request payload.
> - **Tests**:
> - Update integration tests to pass and assert `provider_data` propagation.
> - **Changeset**:
> - Patch bumps for `@medusajs/notification`, `@medusajs/core-flows`, `@medusajs/types`.
>
> <sup>Written by [Cursor Bugbot](https://cursor.com/dashboard?tab=bugbot) for commit 6f114c75c974a145ef60213637d7c41bc605a0bf. This will update automatically on new commits. Configure [here](https://cursor.com/dashboard?tab=bugbot).</sup>
## Summary
Updated context passed for each variant when calculating prices so that `region` and `customer` coming from `setPricingContext` are not overriden if provided.
*Please provide answer here*
Otherwise you can't provide your own `region` and `customer` objects with additional information and you are left with the ones we pass as part of the cart object to the workflows that execute the hook.
*Please provide answer here*
Changed the order in which we define the default `region` and `cart` fields, taking their value from the cart, to before the destructured `setPricingContextResult`.
*Please provide answer here*
**Testing** — How have these changes been tested, or how can the reviewer test the feature?
*Please provide answer here*
---
## Examples
Provide examples or code snippets that demonstrate how this feature works, or how it can be used in practice.
This helps with documentation and ensures maintainers can quickly understand and verify the change.
```ts
// Example usage
```
---
## Checklist
Please ensure the following before requesting a review:
- [x] I have added a **changeset** for this PR
- Every non-breaking change should be marked as a **patch**
- To add a changeset, run `yarn changeset` and follow the prompts
- [ ] The changes are covered by relevant **tests**
- [x] I have verified the code works as intended locally
- [x] I have linked the related issue(s) if applicable
---
## Additional Context
fixes#13990
closes SUP-2647
---
> [!NOTE]
> Adjust pricing context merge order so `setPricingContext`-provided `customer` and `region` are not overridden when calculating variant prices.
>
> - **Core Flows (pricing)**:
> - In `packages/core/core-flows/src/cart/workflows/get-variants-and-items-with-prices.ts`, change merge order when building `baseContext` so `customer` and `region` from `setPricingContextResult` take precedence over cart-derived values when pricing variants.
> - **Changeset**:
> - Add patch changeset for `@medusajs/core-flows`.
>
> <sup>Written by [Cursor Bugbot](https://cursor.com/dashboard?tab=bugbot) for commit 010da7340909016692bea183d022dd0585abdb5a. This will update automatically on new commits. Configure [here](https://cursor.com/dashboard?tab=bugbot).</sup>
* chore(): Cleanup and organize deps
* chore(): Cleanup and organize deps
* chore(): Cleanup and organize deps
* chore(): Cleanup and organize deps
* chore(): Cleanup and organize deps
* chore(): Cleanup and organize deps
* Create lucky-poets-scream.md
* chore(): Cleanup and organize deps
* chore(): Cleanup and organize deps
* chore(): Cleanup and organize deps
* chore(): Cleanup and organize deps
* dedupe snapshot this build
* split into 4 shard
* re configure packages integration tests
* re configure packages integration tests
* re configure packages integration tests
* re configure packages integration tests
* update scripts
* update scripts
* update scripts
* update scripts
* update scripts
* update scripts
* update scripts
* update scripts
* reduce shard for packages
* wip
* chore: prepare for PR
* move to end
* Change order of operations in refundPaymentWorkflow
Updated the order of operations in the refundPaymentWorkflow.
* chore: Add validation
When starting the Medusa application i see the following in the console:
```
update-order-tax-lines: "when" name should be defined. A random one will be assigned to it, which is not recommended for production.
({ input }) => {
return input.item_ids?.length > 0;
}
update-order-tax-lines: "when" name should be defined. A random one will be assigned to it, which is not recommended for production.
({ input }) => {
return input.shipping_method_ids?.length > 0;
}
```
This PR fixes the issue by passing a step name as a first parameter to the `when` usages in `updateOrderTaxLinesWorkflow`
**What**
- implement promotion usage limits per customer/email
- fix registering spend usage over the limit
- fix type errors in promotion module tests
**How**
- introduce a new type of campaign budget that can be defined by an attribute such as customer id or email
- add `CampaignBudgetUsage` entity to keep track of the number of uses per attribute value
- update `registerUsage` and `computeActions` in the promotion module to work with the new type
- update `core-flows` to pass context needed for usage calculation to the promotion module
**Breaking**
- registering promotion usage now throws (and cart complete fails) if the budget limit is exceeded or if the cart completion would result in a breached limit
---
CLOSES CORE-1172
CLOSES CORE-1173
CLOSES CORE-1174
CLOSES CORE-1175
Co-authored-by: Adrien de Peretti <25098370+adrien2p@users.noreply.github.com>
I added a lock in all workflows of the draft order. I don't think there are drawbacks and it will make sure we don't run into concurrency issues in with draft orders. I don't see why we would not add this in the order workflows, let me know and I can add it too.
I also didn't see any workflow that is long enough to justify adding a timeout of more than 2 seconds, but let me know if you think otherwise, we can discuss adjustments :)
CLOSES-1228
Closes#13163
I have a few questions about expected behaviour, since this currently breaks some tests:
- Many tests use the productModule to create products, with default status == "draft", and use the addToCart workflow which now throws. Should I change all breaking tests to specify status == "published" whne creating the product? The alternative would be to check the status in the store API route before the workflow but 1. it would be an extra query and 2. the addToCart workflow is only used in the store currently, and even if it was to be used admin-side, it still doesn't make sense to add a draft product to cart
- After this PR an unpublished product would give the same error as a variant that doesn't exist. While imho this is correct, the thrown error (for both) is "Items do not have a price" which doesn't make much sense(i believe the workflows goes through with an empty variants list and then errors at the price check point). Should I throw a different error when a variant doesn't exists/isn't published?
---
> [!NOTE]
> Enforces that only variants from published products can be added to carts, adds status fetching, refines errors, and updates tests to use ProductStatus.PUBLISHED.
>
> - **Core Flows**:
> - addToCart: Validate variants exist and belong to `product.status = PUBLISHED`; throw clear `INVALID_DATA` when not found/unpublished.
> - Data fetching: Include `product.status` in `cart` and `order` variant field selections.
> - **Tests/Fixtures**:
> - Update integration tests to set `status: ProductStatus.PUBLISHED` when creating products and import `ProductStatus` where needed.
> - Add cases for unpublished products and non-existent variants producing the new error message.
>
> <sup>Written by [Cursor Bugbot](https://cursor.com/dashboard?tab=bugbot) for commit ca72532e957964d2d8e6bcecbb0905054c677ded. This will update automatically on new commits. Configure [here](https://cursor.com/dashboard?tab=bugbot).</sup>
RESOLVES CORE-1153
**What**
- This pr mainly lay the foundation the caching layer. It comes with a modules (built in memory cache) and a redis provider.
- Apply caching to few touch point to test
Co-authored-by: Carlos R. L. Rodrigues <37986729+carlos-r-l-rodrigues@users.noreply.github.com>
RESOLVES CORE-1204
**What**
- Fix wrong price tier when multiple items are targetting the same variant
- fix type import from the wrong package
**Notes**
If you are struggling navigating the changes, you can focus on the following files:
```
integration-tests/http/__tests__/cart/store/cart.spec.ts
integration-tests/modules/__tests__/cart/store/cart.workflows.spec.ts
packages/core/core-flows/src/cart/steps/get-promotion-codes-to-apply.ts
packages/core/core-flows/src/cart/steps/get-variant-price-sets.ts
packages/core/core-flows/src/cart/workflows/add-to-cart.ts
packages/core/core-flows/src/cart/workflows/create-carts.ts
packages/core/core-flows/src/cart/workflows/get-variants-and-items-with-prices.ts
packages/core/core-flows/src/cart/workflows/refresh-cart-items.ts
packages/core/core-flows/src/order/workflows/add-line-items.ts
packages/core/core-flows/src/order/workflows/create-order.ts
```
