**What**
- Adjust lock duration, it is in seconds and not in ms
- Log on lock release
- Renew lock separately from the other promises
- Add more logs
- Log when lock can't be acquired. It can be expected in case two processes try to sync the same entity and in that case it can be ignored. But at least it gives some information in case it happens for another reason
- Log when the release lock failed, the lock will remain in the locking provider for 1 minute before being removed. But it wont prevent other entities to be synced
Since the runtime of the `@medusajs/analytics-posthog` relies on `posthog-node` package. It should be either installed as a dependency or a peerDependency that will be satisfied by the user project.
In this PR, I have added it as a peer dependency
* feat: Add an analytics module and local and posthog providers
* fix: Add tests and wire up in missing places
* fix: Address feedback and add missing module typing
* fix: Address feedback and add missing module typing
---------
Co-authored-by: Adrien de Peretti <adrien.deperetti@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Oli Juhl <59018053+olivermrbl@users.noreply.github.com>
**What**
- Add missing index for query that falls in select in strategy, specifically the heaviest one with variant IN filtering
- Allow to force the strategy to be sent to the entry point module when using the graph API. It is useful with big dataset where filtering is enough without pagination and select in can offer better performances
e.g
```ts
await query.graph({
entity: 'product',
fields,
filters,
strategy: 'select-in' // <-- this will force the module to use receive this value and apply it accordingly
})
```
* add failing test for upsertWithReplace order
* reproduce prices update shuffling issue
* fix: fix order of returned updates in updateMany
* fix: fix order of returned updates in ProductService
* fix: reset test count to 1
* Create tame-insects-marry.md
---------
Co-authored-by: Oli Juhl <59018053+olivermrbl@users.noreply.github.com>
**What**
Currently, runAsStep keep reference of the workflow context that is being run as step, except that the step is composed for the current workflow composition and not the workflow being run as a step. Therefore, the context are currently miss matched leading to wrong configuration being used in case of async workflows.
**BUG**
This fix allow the runAsStep to use the current composition context to configure the step for the sub workflow to be run
**BUG BREAKING**
fix the step config wrongly used to wrap async step handlers. Now steps configured async through .config that returns a new step response will indeed marked itself as success without the need for background execution or calling setStepSuccess (as it was expected originally)
**FEATURE**
This pr also add support for cancelling running transaction, the transaction will be marked as being cancelled, once the current step finished, it will cancel the transaction to start compensating all previous steps including itself
Co-authored-by: Carlos R. L. Rodrigues <37986729+carlos-r-l-rodrigues@users.noreply.github.com>
**What**
Make sure there is no open handles left and that the shutdown function are properly called. Refactor and improve the medusa test runner. Make sure all modules instances are released and cleaned up
**NOTE:**
On a separate PR we can continue the investigation for the memory growing over time while the tests execute
* feat: implement direct upload
* feat: add direct-upload endpoint
* refactor: implement feedback
* refactor: have a dedicated endpoint for direct uploads
* refactor: convert responses to snakecase
* refactor: rename method to createImport
* test: add tests for the presigned-urls endpoint
* feat(index): add filterable fields to link definition
* rm comment
* break recursion
* validate read only links
* validate filterable
* gql schema array
* link parents
* isInverse
* push id when not present
* Fix ciruclar relationships and add tests to ensure proper behaviour (part 1)
* log and fallback to entity.alias
* cleanup and fixes
* cleanup and fixes
* cleanup and fixes
* fix get attributes
* gql type
* unit test
* array inference
* rm only
* package.json
* pacvkage.json
* fix link retrieval on duplicated entity type and aliases + tests
* link parents as array
* Match only parent entity
* rm comment
* remove hard coded schema
* extend types
* unit test
* test
* types
* pagination type
* type
* fix integration tests
* Improve performance of in selection
* use @@ to filter property
* escape jsonPath
* add Event Bus by default
* changeset
* rm postgres analyze
* estimate count
* new query
* parent aliases
* inner query w/ filter and sort relations
* address comments
---------
Co-authored-by: adrien2p <adrien.deperetti@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Oli Juhl <59018053+olivermrbl@users.noreply.github.com>
* fix: return fulfillment creation
* chore: changeset
* fix: link
* fix: cancel claim flow
* chore: test fulfillment creation as a part of return lifecycle test
* fix: exchanges cancle flow
---------
Co-authored-by: Oli Juhl <59018053+olivermrbl@users.noreply.github.com>
* feat: Add support for uploading a file directly to the file provider from the client
* fix: Add missing types and add a couple of module tests
* fix: Allow nested routes, add test for it
**What**
Now that all events management are fixed in the workflows life cycle, the run as step needs to leverage the workflow engine if present (which should always be the case for async workflows) in order to ensure the continuation and the ability to mark parent step in parent workflow as success or failure
Co-authored-by: Carlos R. L. Rodrigues <37986729+carlos-r-l-rodrigues@users.noreply.github.com>
**What**
We found out that the pricing context from the cart always contains the entire cart, even though it is kind of wrong. The issue is that even though we improve the performances of the query, it will cost a lot to have hundreds of constraint for nothing potentially. For that reason, we cache the attributes in memory with the best possible query we can do to gather them and we renew them when we perform a calculate prices if it has been reset. That way, we ensure we don't have unnecessary checks on attributes that does not have rules.
Since we don't have the type table anymore which was doing that for us and until we have a proper caching layer it would do IMO. But the rules type table was very useful for these attributes findings
**What**
Reduce database queries when possible and use proper data structure and aggregation when possible in order to reduce performance decrease overall
