## Summary
**What** — What changes are introduced in this PR?
Export Zod as a dependency of `@medusajs/framework`.
Closes DX-2414
**Why** — Why are these changes relevant or necessary?
Zod is an essential part of Medusa development. We use it in the core and developers use it in their customizations.
Developers using pnpm won't have access to Zod, as it's not a top-level dependency. While they can install any version, since Zod is an essential aspect of our framework, it's more convenient that we export it and make it accessible to developers.
**How** — How have these changes been implemented?
1. Add Zod as a dependency in `@medusajs/deps` and export it in `@medusajs/framework`
2. Change imports of Zod across projects to import from `@medusajs/framework` and remove the Zod dependency.
> Note: this change doesn't cover admin extensions (and our related packages), as they're not related to the Medusa framework and using Zod in them isn't part of the conventions we document.
Developers can import Zod like this now:
```ts
import { z } from "@medusajs/framework/zod"
```
**Testing** — How have these changes been tested, or how can the reviewer test the feature?
Use the following import in a Medusa project to create an validate zod schemas:
```bash
import { MedusaRequest, MedusaResponse } from "@medusajs/framework/http";
import { z } from "@medusajs/framework/zod"
export const PostCustomSchema = z.object({
name: z.string(),
})
type PostCustomSchema = z.infer<typeof PostCustomSchema>
export async function POST(
req: MedusaRequest<PostCustomSchema>,
res: MedusaResponse
) {
res.json({
message: `Hello, ${req.validatedBody.name}`
})
}
// in middleware
import { defineMiddlewares, validateAndTransformBody } from "@medusajs/framework/http"
import { PostCustomSchema } from "./admin/custom/route"
export default defineMiddlewares({
routes: [
{
matcher: "/custom",
middlewares: [validateAndTransformBody(PostCustomSchema)],
},
],
})
```
---
## Examples
-
---
## Checklist
Please ensure the following before requesting a review:
- [x] I have added a **changeset** for this PR
- Every non-breaking change should be marked as a **patch**
- To add a changeset, run `yarn changeset` and follow the prompts
- [ ] The changes are covered by relevant **tests**
- [x] I have verified the code works as intended locally
- [x] I have linked the related issue(s) if applicable
---
## Additional Context
-
* chore(): Cleanup and organize deps
* chore(): Cleanup and organize deps
* chore(): Cleanup and organize deps
* chore(): Cleanup and organize deps
* chore(): Cleanup and organize deps
* chore(): Cleanup and organize deps
* Create lucky-poets-scream.md
* chore(): Cleanup and organize deps
* chore(): Cleanup and organize deps
* chore(): Cleanup and organize deps
* chore(): Cleanup and organize deps
* dedupe snapshot this build
* split into 4 shard
* re configure packages integration tests
* re configure packages integration tests
* re configure packages integration tests
* re configure packages integration tests
* update scripts
* update scripts
* update scripts
* update scripts
* update scripts
* update scripts
* update scripts
* update scripts
* reduce shard for packages
**What**
After lot of investigation, we finally found one of our performance regerssion point (see [here](https://github.com/mikro-orm/mikro-orm/issues/6905)), this pr downgrade mikro orm and move the strategy back to select in where needed
PARTIALLY RESOLVES CORE-1156
**What**
Improve upsertWithReplace to batch as much as possible what can be batched. Performance of this method will be much greater specially for cases with maybe entities and batch (e.g we seen many cases where they bulk product with hundreds variants and options etc)
for example let take the following object:
- entity 1
- entity 2 []
- entity 3 []
- entity 2 []
- entity 3 []
here all entity 3 will be batched and all entity 2 will be batched
I ve also added a pretty detail test that check all the stage and what is batched or not with many comments so that it is less harder to consume and remember in the future
Also includes:
- mikro orm upgade (issues found and fixes)
- order module hooks fixes
**NOTE**
It was easier for now to do this instead of rewriting the different areas where it is being used, also, maybe it means that we will have closer performance to what we would expect to have natively
**NOTE 2**
Also fix the fact that integration tests of the core packages never ran 😂
