**What**
- Admin sales channels API routes
- Workflows for creating, updating, and deleting sales channels
- Align `ISalesChannelModuleService` interface with update + upsert conventions
- Integrate v2 tests into v1 sales channels integration test suite
- Add metadata to sales channel entity
Sales channel <> Product management will come in a follow-up PR.
On the integration tests, creating, updating, and deleting are passing with the V2 flag enabled. You'll have to take my word for it (or run them yourself), as they are not included in the CI.
**What**
Update all transform middleware to support the new API
- deprecate `defaultRelations`
- deprecate `allowedRelations`
- Add `defaults` and `allowed` in replacement for `defaultFields` and `allowedFields` respectively
- in the `defaults` it is possible to specify a field such as `*variants` in order to be recognized as a relation only without specifying any property
- add support for `remoteQueryConfig` assigned to req like we have for `listConfig` and `retrieveConfig`
- add support to override `allowed|allowedFields` if a previous middleware have set it up on the req.allowed
- The api now accepts `fields` as the only accepted fields to manage the requested props and relations, the `expand` property have been deprecated. New supported symbols have been added in complement of the fields
- `+` (e.g `/store/products?fields=+description`) to specify that description should be added as part of the returned data among the other defined fields
- `-` (e.g `/store/products?fields=-description`) to specify that description should be removed as part of the returned data
- `*` (e.g `/store/products?fields=*variants`) to specify that the variants relations should be added as part of the returned data among the other defined fields without having to specify which property of the variants should be returned. In the `defaults` config of the transform middleware it is also possible to use this symbol
- In the case no symbol is provided, it will replace the default fields and mean that only the specified fields must be returned
About the allowed validation, all fields in the `defaults` configuration must be present in the `allowed` configuration.
In case the `defaults` contains full relation selection (e.g `*product.variants`) it should be present in the `allowed` as `product.variants`. In case in the `defaults` you add `product.variants.id`, it will be allowed if the `allowed` configuration includes either `product.variants.id` as full match or `product.variants` as it means that we allow all properties from `product.variants`
Also, support for `*` selection on the remote query/joiner have been added
**Note**
All v2 end points refactoring can be done separately
The changes in this PR are:
1. Change how product options are created and stored. The relationship changed from
`options --> option values <-- variants`
to
`options --> option values --> variant options <-- variants`
Now we can enforce non-duplicate option values, easier creation and updates of options, and more.
2. Refactors the product module. The product module did a lot of things in a non-ideal approach, and this is a step towards a more consistent usage of the base repository and methods exposed by a module. There is still work left to improve the module, but a large chunk of the changes are included in this PR
Things to do as a follow-up:
1. Remove many-to-many relationships if an empty list is passed in the base repository.
2. Improve the typings of the module
3. Further cleanup and improvements (there are few questions that I need answered before I can improve the API)
Apologies for the giant PR in advance, but most of these are removing of files and migrations from old workflows and routes to new.
What:
- Adds CRUD endpoints for price lists
- Migrate workflows from old sdk to new
- Added missing updatePriceListPrices method to pricing module
what:
- adds fulfillment shipping option rules batch endpoint
- remove fulfillment shipping option rules batch endpoint
- breaks my British based education to not call it fulfilment with a single "l"
The 2 bigger remaining tasks are:
1. handling prices for variants
2. Handling options (breaking change)
After that all tests should pass on both v1 and v2
In this PR:
1. I added upsert support for the product
2. I updated the create and update signatures to match the latest interface standards
3. Small changes to make the v1 and v2 APIs compatible (WIP)
Few things to keep in mind:
1. You need to set MEDUSA_FF_MEDUSA_V2 to true before running the tests to run with the v2 API
2. You can use the `breaking` function to differentiate between v1 and v2 differences. This can help us identify what was breaking pretty quickly afterwards
3. You will need to run specific tests for now instead of all if you want to target v2. I think that's fine though, as we don't really need these to run on every PR until we have feature parity (and by then, all tests would be both v1 and v2 compatible)
**note: Adrien**
- add a new way to load modules only to run their loaders comparable to the way to run the migrations only
- improve tests runner to cleanup the data properly as well as re running all loaders and core defaults
Co-authored-by: Adrien de Peretti <25098370+adrien2p@users.noreply.github.com>
This implementation obviously lacks a lot of things, and there are a lot of TODOs. However, there are already a lot of questions I'd rather get answered soon, so I figured it's much easier to do the implementation in steps.
I wrote down all breaking changes, suggested changes, and new additions with comments (TODO and Note).
In a follow-up PR I will:
Add the remaining/missing models
Make the workflows handle all interactions between the different models/modules
Add integration tests
**What**
Adds endpoints to manage tax rules on a tax rate:
- Create a tax rule: POST /admin/tax-rates/:id/rules
- Delete a tax rule: DELETE /admin/tax-rates/:id/rules/:rule_id
- Replace tax rules: POST /admin/tax-rates/:id -- with { rules: [...] } in body.
### Noteworthy things I bumped into
**Updating nested relationships**
A TaxRate can have multiple TaxRules and in this PR we enable users to replace all TaxRules associated with a TaxRate in one operation. If working with the module directly this can be done with:
```javascript
taxModuleService.update(rateId, { rules: [{ ... }] })
```
Internally in the `update` function the TaxModule first soft deletes any TaxRules that exist on the TaxRate and then creates new TaxRules for the passed rules ([see test](https://github.com/medusajs/medusa/pull/6557/files#diff-cdcbab80ac7928b80648088ec57a3ab09dddd4409d6afce034f2caff08ee022bR78)).
A challenge arises when doing this in a compensatable way in a workflow. To see this imagine the following:
1. `updateTaxRatesWorkflow` gets the current data for the tax rates to update. This includes the tax rates' rules.
2. `updateTaxRatesWorkflow` calls `taxModuleService.update` with new rules.
3. Internally, the tax module deletes the rules in 1. and creates new rules.
4. Imagine an error happens in a following step and the workflow has to compensate.
5. The workflow uses the data from 1. and calls upsert. The tax module may correctly update the previous tax rules so they are no longer soft deleted. However, upsert (at least not by default) doesn't delete the new rules that were created in 2.
As illustrated by 5. compensating the update is not pretty. To get around this I instead opted to let the workflow handle setting the rules for a rate that makes the compensation more straightforward to handle. [See workflow here](https://github.com/medusajs/medusa/pull/6557/files#diff-ff19e1f2fa32289aefff90d33c05c154f9605a3c5da6a62683071a1fcaedfd7bR89).
**Using nested workflows**
Initially, I wanted to use the `setTaxRateRulesWorkflow` within the `updateTaxRatesWorkflow`. And this worked great for the invoke phase. However, when I needed to compensate the update workflow (and hence also had to compensate the set rules workflow), I found that the workflow engine no longer had the set rules transaction in memory and therefore could not roll it back. ([This is where I try to rollback](https://github.com/medusajs/medusa/pull/6557/files#diff-ff19e1f2fa32289aefff90d33c05c154f9605a3c5da6a62683071a1fcaedfd7bR62), but the transaction id can't be found).
I therefore opted to copy the steps from the set tax rate rules workflow into the update tax rates workflow; however, once we figure out a good way to ensure we can compensate nested workflows we should move to the nested workflow instead.
This also made me realize that the current implementation of workflows that use `refreshCartPromotions` may create inconsistencies in case of failures (cc: @riqwan).
I ultimately went with having a flat list of settings for the store. It wouldn't be very difficult to change it if we wish to do so, but for now this keeps the codebase simpler
**What**
Add missing support for updating countries on the POST /admin/regions/:id route.
Furthermore, the PR refactors how the normalization and validation was handled in both create and update scenarios.
Finally, the PR adds a unique index on the country entity, which ensures at the DB level that we cannot have a duplicate country in the DB for a single region.
**What**
Add `POST /admin/regions`
Add `POST /admin/regions/:id`
Add `DELETE /admin/regions/:id`
All are added for v2 using API Routes and workflows.
In follow-up PRs, I will add support for passing countries in update and create.
Update: First follow-up PR is #6372
**What**
- add accept invite endpoint
**Invite accept flow**
- authenticate using the auth endpoint to create and auth-user
- invoke accept endpoint with token and info to create user
Philip Korsholm
Oli Juhl
Riqwan Thamir
Adrien de Peretti
Stevche Radevski
Sebastian Rindom