* feat(dashboard,core,modules): free shipping promotion in dashboard
* self-review
* adapt for edit to work
* changeset
* integration tests
* across for each
* remove only from tests
* remove console log
* revert to across
* update wording for shipping promotions
* modify changeset
* suggestion frane
* fix i18n schema
* fix: return fulfillment creation
* chore: changeset
* fix: link
* fix: cancel claim flow
* chore: test fulfillment creation as a part of return lifecycle test
* fix: exchanges cancle flow
---------
Co-authored-by: Oli Juhl <59018053+olivermrbl@users.noreply.github.com>
What:
* Add `hasMany` for links that accepted that in the past. That way we don't block marketplaces to link 1 cart to multiple orders and carts with split payment.
* feat: add createMultiple flag to enforce inApp link uniqueness
* changes
* mocks
* default
* many to many
---------
Co-authored-by: Carlos R. L. Rodrigues <rodrigolr@gmail.com>
**What**
- remove cascade delete of inventory items on product delete
- implement inventory deletion in product/variant delete workflows with checks:
- product/variant cannot be deleted if there are reservations associated with their inventory items
- inventory item will be cascade deleted if it's not used by other variants (that are not being deleted in the current flow)
---
FIXES CC-581 CC-582
what:
- enables a button to create a payment link when a payment delta is present
- api to delete order payment collection
- adds a pending amount to payment collections
Note: Not the happiest with the decision on when to create a payment collection and when not to. The code should programatically create or delete payment collections currently to generate the right collection for the payment delta. Adding a more specific flow to create and manage a payment collection will help reduce this burden from the code path and onto CX/merchant.
Another issue I found is that the payment collection status doesn't get updated when payment is complete as it still gets stuck to "authorized" state
https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/037a10f9-3621-43c2-94ba-1ada4b0a041b
This also includes rework of the currency model for the Store module.
This change is breaking as existing stores won't have any supported currencies set, so users would need to go to the store settings again and choose the supported currencies there.
**What**
Update the `MedusaService` class, factory and types to remove the concept of main modules. The idea being that all method will be explicitly named and suffixes to represent the object you are trying to manipulate.
This pr also includes various fixes in different modules
Co-authored-by: Stevche Radevski <4820812+sradevski@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Oli Juhl <59018053+olivermrbl@users.noreply.github.com>
* chore: Clean up authentication middlewares
* chore: Rename AuthUser to AuthIdentity
* feat: Define link between user, customer, and auth identity
* feat: Use links for auth, update auth context content
* fix: Adjust user create command with new auth setup
* fix: Make auth login more dynamic, review fixes
* fix: Change test assertions for created by
* feat: initial impl. of Unfulfilled section and create flow
* feat: create fulfillment
* feat: order <> fulfillment link, fulfillment section
* feat: accept order_id when creating fulfillment
* feat: finish create and cancel
* fix: integration test
* refactor: real Order<>Fulfillment link instead readonly, add link step to the workflow
* fix: revert `order_id` definitions
* chore: add changeset
* fix: build
* fix: address comments
* fix: fetch inventory and location levels for fulfilled variant
* fix: loading inventory details
* add isList to order fulfillment link
* fix: duplicate declaration
* fix: type
* refactor: link orders step, fix client
* fix: move translations to the new file
* fix: pass order id in test
---------
Co-authored-by: olivermrbl <oliver@mrbltech.com>
**what**
- Create return workflow partial implementation
- Update some order domain types
- create order fulfillment link
**NOTE**
this PR is partially done but can still be merged as is, it will require some discussions around the flow and some unknowns or uncertainty in regards to some data and some behaviour
