* feat: carry over promotions toggle on exchanges
* fix: inital flag value, return the flag on preview
* fix: validation of allocation type
* fix: revert client changes
* fix: invert condition
* feat: recompute adjustments when outbound item is updated
* fix: condition again
* fix: display more accurate inbound/outbound totals for exchanges
* fix: make exchanges specs green
* feat: more testing cases
* wip: pr feedback
* fix: use plural for the flag on Admin
* fix: schema test, route refactor
* feat: tooltip
* feat: refactor to use update workflow
* feat: display applied promotion per item on order details, show copy sku on hover
* feat: refactor edits and exchanges to have common flag toggle flow
* fix: delete empty file
* fix: exchange_id param query
* wip
* add wip
* wip
* reuse action
* finish first draft
* fix tests
* cleanup
* Only compute adjustments when necessary
* Create hot-carrots-look.md
* address comments
* minor tweaks
* fix pay col
* fix test
* wip
* Dwip
* wip
* fix: adjustment typo
* fix: import
* fix: workflow imports
* wip: update test
* feat: upsert versioned adjustments when previewing order
* fix: revert unique codes change
* fix: order spec test with versioning
* wip: save
* feat: make adjustments work for preview and confirm flow, wip base repo filtering of older version adjustments
* fix: missing populate where
* wip: populate where loading versioned adjustments
* fix: filter out older adjustment versions
* temp: comment adjustments in repo
* test: add adjustment if no version
* wip: configure populate where in order base repository
* fix: rm manual filtering
* fix: revert base repo changes
* fix: revert
* fix: use order item version instead of order version
* fix: rm only in test
* fix: update case spec
* fix: remove sceanrio, wip test with draft promotion
* feat: test correct adjustments when disabling promotion
* feat: complex test case
* feat: test consecutive order edits
* feat: 2 promotions test case with a fixed promo
* feat: migrate existing order line item adjustments to order items latest version
* feat: update dep after merge
* wip: load adjustments separatley
* feat: adjustments collections
* fix: spread result, handle related entity case
* fix: update lock
* feat: make sure version is loaded, refactor, handle related entity case
* fix: check fields
* feat: loading adjustments for list and count
* fix: correct items version field
* fix: rm empty array
* fix: wip order modules spec
* fix: order module specs
* feat: preinit items adjustments
* fix: rm only
* fix: rm only
* chore: cleanup
* fix: migration files
* fix: dont change formatting
* fix: core package build
* chore: more cleanup
* fix: item update util
* fix: duplicate import
* fix: refresh adjustments for exchanges (#13992)
* wip: exchange adjustments
* feat: test - receive items
* feat: finish test case
* fix: casing
* fix(draft-orders, core-flows, orders) refresh adjustments for draft orders (#14025)
* wip: draft orders adjustments refresh
* feat: rewrite to use REPLACE action + test
* fix: rm only
* feat: cleanup old REPLACE actions
* feat: cleanup adjustemnts when 0 promotions
* wip: canceling draft order
* fix: make version arg optional
* fix: restore promotion links
* feat: test reverting on cancelation
* fix: address comments in tests
* wip: fix summary on preview
* fix: get pending diff on preview summary from total
* fix: revert pending diff change
---------
Co-authored-by: fPolic <mainacc.polic@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Frane Polić <16856471+fPolic@users.noreply.github.com>
## Summary
**What** — What changes are introduced in this PR?
Allow users to delete other users and prevent them from deleting themselves.
**Why** — Why are these changes relevant or necessary?
Inability to delete other users causes old users that maybe don't work anymore with the business to have access still.
**How** — How have these changes been implemented?
Inverted the check in the admin delete user endpoint, to allow users deleting other users but themselves.
**Testing** — How have these changes been tested, or how can the reviewer test the feature?
Integration tests
---
## Examples
Provide examples or code snippets that demonstrate how this feature works, or how it can be used in practice.
This helps with documentation and ensures maintainers can quickly understand and verify the change.
```ts
// Example usage
```
---
## Checklist
Please ensure the following before requesting a review:
- [x] I have added a **changeset** for this PR
- Every non-breaking change should be marked as a **patch**
- To add a changeset, run `yarn changeset` and follow the prompts
- [x] The changes are covered by relevant **tests**
- [x] I have verified the code works as intended locally
- [x] I have linked the related issue(s) if applicable
---
## Additional Context
Add any additional context, related issues, or references that might help the reviewer understand this PR.
closes OPS-97
---
> [!NOTE]
> Enables deleting other users via admin DELETE endpoint while blocking self-deletion, with corresponding integration tests and changeset.
>
> - **Backend**
> - Update `DELETE /admin/users/:id` in `packages/medusa/src/api/admin/users/[id]/route.ts`:
> - Disallow self-deletion when `actor_id === id` with `NOT_ALLOWED` error.
> - Execute `removeUserAccountWorkflow` and return standard delete response.
> - **Tests**
> - Expand `integration-tests/http/__tests__/user/admin/user.spec.ts`:
> - Create a second admin user; delete it and verify auth identity `app_metadata` no longer includes `user_id`.
> - Confirm token still authenticates but access is revoked (401 on `/admin/users/me`).
> - Assert self-deletion returns 400 with message `"A user cannot delete itself"`.
> - **Changeset**
> - Add `.changeset/dull-plants-create.md` (patch for `@medusajs/medusa`).
>
> <sup>Written by [Cursor Bugbot](https://cursor.com/dashboard?tab=bugbot) for commit f1f8252b91593b8a8fb03dc9d26460d09a10cfaa. This will update automatically on new commits. Configure [here](https://cursor.com/dashboard?tab=bugbot).</sup>
* feat(index): Add support to trigger sync manually
* feat(index): Add API route to interact with
* feat(index): Add API route to interact with
* feat(index): Add API route to interact with
* test(): Add http integration tests
* Create weak-elephants-reply.md
### What
Add a new `once` allocation strategy to promotions that limits application to a maximum number of items across the entire cart, rather than per line item.
### Why
Merchants want to create promotions that apply to a limited number of items across the entire cart. For example:
- "Get $10 off, applied to one item only"
- "20% off up to 2 items in your cart"
Current allocation strategies:
- `each`: Applies to each line item independently (respects `max_quantity` per item)
- `across`: Distributes proportionally across all items
Neither supports limiting total applications across the entire cart.
### How
Add `once` to the `ApplicationMethodAllocation` enum.
Behavior:
- Applies promotion to maximum `max_quantity` items across entire cart
- Always prioritizes lowest-priced eligible items first
- Distributes sequentially across items until quota exhausted
- Requires `max_quantity` field to be set
### Example Usage
**Scenario 1: Fixed discount**
```javascript
{
type: "fixed",
allocation: "once",
value: 10, // $10 off
max_quantity: 2 // Apply to 2 items max across cart
}
Cart:
- Item A: 3 units @ $100/unit
- Item B: 5 units @ $50/unit (lowest price)
Result: $20 discount on Item B (2 units × $10)
```
**Scenario 2: Distribution across items**
```javascript
{
type: "fixed",
allocation: "once",
value: 5,
max_quantity: 4
}
Cart:
- Item A: 2 units @ $50/unit
- Item B: 3 units @ $60/unit
Result:
- Item A: $10 discount (2 units × $5)
- Item B: $10 discount (2 units × $5, remaining quota)
```
**Scenario 3: Percentage discount - single item**
```javascript
{
type: "percentage",
allocation: "once",
value: 20, // 20% off
max_quantity: 3 // Apply to 3 items max
}
Cart:
- Item A: 5 units @ $100/unit
- Item B: 4 units @ $50/unit (lowest price)
Result: $30 discount on Item B (3 units × $50 × 20% = $30)
```
**Scenario 4: Percentage discount - distributed across items**
```javascript
{
type: "percentage",
allocation: "once",
value: 15, // 15% off
max_quantity: 5
}
Cart:
- Item A: 2 units @ $40/unit (lowest price)
- Item B: 4 units @ $80/unit
Result:
- Item A: $12 discount (2 units × $40 × 15% = $12)
- Item B: $36 discount (3 units × $80 × 15% = $36, remaining quota)
Total: $48 discount
```
**Scenario 5: Percentage with max_quantity = 1**
```javascript
{
type: "percentage",
allocation: "once",
value: 25, // 25% off
max_quantity: 1 // Only one item
}
Cart:
- Item A: 3 units @ $60/unit
- Item B: 2 units @ $30/unit (lowest price)
Result: $7.50 discount on Item B (1 unit × $30 × 25%)
```
* wip
* chore: prepare for PR
* move to end
* Change order of operations in refundPaymentWorkflow
Updated the order of operations in the refundPaymentWorkflow.
* chore: Add validation
**What**
- implement promotion usage limits per customer/email
- fix registering spend usage over the limit
- fix type errors in promotion module tests
**How**
- introduce a new type of campaign budget that can be defined by an attribute such as customer id or email
- add `CampaignBudgetUsage` entity to keep track of the number of uses per attribute value
- update `registerUsage` and `computeActions` in the promotion module to work with the new type
- update `core-flows` to pass context needed for usage calculation to the promotion module
**Breaking**
- registering promotion usage now throws (and cart complete fails) if the budget limit is exceeded or if the cart completion would result in a breached limit
---
CLOSES CORE-1172
CLOSES CORE-1173
CLOSES CORE-1174
CLOSES CORE-1175
Co-authored-by: Adrien de Peretti <25098370+adrien2p@users.noreply.github.com>
Closes#13163
I have a few questions about expected behaviour, since this currently breaks some tests:
- Many tests use the productModule to create products, with default status == "draft", and use the addToCart workflow which now throws. Should I change all breaking tests to specify status == "published" whne creating the product? The alternative would be to check the status in the store API route before the workflow but 1. it would be an extra query and 2. the addToCart workflow is only used in the store currently, and even if it was to be used admin-side, it still doesn't make sense to add a draft product to cart
- After this PR an unpublished product would give the same error as a variant that doesn't exist. While imho this is correct, the thrown error (for both) is "Items do not have a price" which doesn't make much sense(i believe the workflows goes through with an empty variants list and then errors at the price check point). Should I throw a different error when a variant doesn't exists/isn't published?
---
> [!NOTE]
> Enforces that only variants from published products can be added to carts, adds status fetching, refines errors, and updates tests to use ProductStatus.PUBLISHED.
>
> - **Core Flows**:
> - addToCart: Validate variants exist and belong to `product.status = PUBLISHED`; throw clear `INVALID_DATA` when not found/unpublished.
> - Data fetching: Include `product.status` in `cart` and `order` variant field selections.
> - **Tests/Fixtures**:
> - Update integration tests to set `status: ProductStatus.PUBLISHED` when creating products and import `ProductStatus` where needed.
> - Add cases for unpublished products and non-existent variants producing the new error message.
>
> <sup>Written by [Cursor Bugbot](https://cursor.com/dashboard?tab=bugbot) for commit ca72532e957964d2d8e6bcecbb0905054c677ded. This will update automatically on new commits. Configure [here](https://cursor.com/dashboard?tab=bugbot).</sup>
RESOLVES CORE-1153
**What**
- This pr mainly lay the foundation the caching layer. It comes with a modules (built in memory cache) and a redis provider.
- Apply caching to few touch point to test
Co-authored-by: Carlos R. L. Rodrigues <37986729+carlos-r-l-rodrigues@users.noreply.github.com>
RESOLVES CORE-1204
**What**
- Fix wrong price tier when multiple items are targetting the same variant
- fix type import from the wrong package
**Notes**
If you are struggling navigating the changes, you can focus on the following files:
```
integration-tests/http/__tests__/cart/store/cart.spec.ts
integration-tests/modules/__tests__/cart/store/cart.workflows.spec.ts
packages/core/core-flows/src/cart/steps/get-promotion-codes-to-apply.ts
packages/core/core-flows/src/cart/steps/get-variant-price-sets.ts
packages/core/core-flows/src/cart/workflows/add-to-cart.ts
packages/core/core-flows/src/cart/workflows/create-carts.ts
packages/core/core-flows/src/cart/workflows/get-variants-and-items-with-prices.ts
packages/core/core-flows/src/cart/workflows/refresh-cart-items.ts
packages/core/core-flows/src/order/workflows/add-line-items.ts
packages/core/core-flows/src/order/workflows/create-order.ts
```
This PR fixes the issue #13518 where product category descendants were not retrieved when
filtering by handle with the include_descendants_tree flag. The handle filter was not
being correctly removed before the descendant tree query was executed.
* fix(utils,core-flows): subtotal calculation and returns location
* changeset
* fix test
* var
* rm extra field from test
* fix original total
* fix partial refunds and pending difference
* fix test
* fix test
* test
* extract to util
* original total and update payment when receive return
* original_subtotal
* default fields
* test
* calculate pending difference
* revert claims test
* pending difference
* creadit line fix
* if
* feat(core-flows): add hook to set shipping option context when listing them
* changeset
* add integration test
* add it to other workflow
* missing hook in workflow response
* rework workflow
* rework workflow
* typing issue
* comment from oli
* cursor the goat
* tests
* save lines
* move code around
* missing additional params in many places
* smal fix
* smal fix
* test(): test dynamic max workers
* test(): test dynamic max workers
* test(): test dynamic max workers
* test(): test dynamic max workers
* test(): test dynamic max workers
* test(): test dynamic max workers
* test(): test dynamic max workers
* test(): test dynamic max workers
* test(): test dynamic max workers
* test(): test dynamic max workers
* test(): test dynamic max workers
* test(): test dynamic max workers
* test(): test dynamic max workers
* test(): test dynamic max workers
* test(): test dynamic max workers
* test(): test dynamic max workers
* Clarify test description and improve CI
