### Scope
Models PA to PU
### What
Refactor OAS for models to accurately represent their shape in API responses.
### Why
About 33% of model fields are not accurately represented in the OAS. Most of the issues are:
- fields that can not be omitted in the response are not declared as `required`
- fields that could return `null` as their value are not declared as `nullable: true`
When using a code generator, these OAS issues would lead to inaccurate response shapes in the generated client.
### How
#### nullable
Fields meeting at least one of the following condition will be represented as `nullable: true` in OAS:
* The field is decorated with `@Column({ nullable: true })`
* The field is decorated with `@OneToOne`, `@ManyToOne`
* The field is decorated with `@DeleteDateColumn`
#### optional
Fields meeting at least one of the following conditions will never be listed as `required` in OAS and will be considered optional and could be omitted in the response:
* The field is decorated with `@OneToOne`, `@ManyToOne`, `@OneToMany`, `@ManyToMany`
* The field is decorated with `@FeatureFlagColumn`
* The field is decorated with `@Column({select: false})`
* The field is representing dynamic values not persisted in the database
Fields not meeting any of the conditions above will be declared as `required` and are expected to be present in the response.
### Test
* Ran OAS validator.
* Ran docs build script.
Expect OAS changes to be reflected in the API documentation.
### Scope
Models F to O
### What
Refactor OAS for models to accurately represent their shape in API responses.
### Why
About 33% of model fields are not accurately represented in the OAS. Most of the issues are:
- fields that can not be omitted in the response are not declared as `required`
- fields that could return `null` as their value are not declared as `nullable: true`
When using a code generator, these OAS issues would lead to inaccurate response shapes in the generated client.
### How
#### nullable
Fields meeting at least one of the following condition will be represented as `nullable: true` in OAS:
* The field is decorated with `@Column({ nullable: true })`
* The field is decorated with `@OneToOne`, `@ManyToOne`
* The field is decorated with `@DeleteDateColumn`
#### optional
Fields meeting at least one of the following conditions will never be listed as `required` in OAS and will be considered optional and could be omitted in the response:
* The field is decorated with `@OneToOne`, `@ManyToOne`, `@OneToMany`, `@ManyToMany`
* The field is decorated with `@FeatureFlagColumn`
* The field is decorated with `@Column({select: false})`
* The field is representing dynamic values not persisted in the database
Fields not meeting any of the conditions above will be declared as `required` and are expected to be present in the response.
### Test
* Ran OAS validator.
* Ran docs build script.
Expect OAS changes to be reflected in the API documentation.
### Scope
Models A to D
### What
Refactor OAS for models to accurately represent their shape in API responses.
### Why
About 33% of model fields are not accurately represented in the OAS. Most of the issues are:
- fields that can not be omitted in the response are not declared as `required`
- fields that could return `null` as their value are not declared as `nullable: true`
When using a code generator, these OAS issues would lead to inaccurate response shapes in the generated client.
### How
#### nullable
Fields meeting at least one of the following condition will be represented as `nullable: true` in OAS:
* The field is decorated with `@Column({ nullable: true })`
* The field is decorated with `@OneToOne`, `@ManyToOne`
* The field is decorated with `@DeleteDateColumn`
#### optional
Fields meeting at least one of the following conditions will never be listed as `required` in OAS and will be considered optional and could be omitted in the response:
* The field is decorated with `@OneToOne`, `@ManyToOne`, `@OneToMany`, `@ManyToMany`
* The field is decorated with `@FeatureFlagColumn`
* The field is decorated with `@Column({select: false})`
* The field is representing dynamic values not persisted in the database
Fields not meeting any of the conditions above will be declared as `required` and are expected to be present in the response.
### Test
* Ran OAS validator.
* Ran docs build script.
Expect OAS changes to be reflected in the API documentation.
This PR improves the OAS by adding `type: object` to schemas that have `properties` and no `type`. While this attribute is not required for a valid spec, omitting it opens the possibilities of non-object input. See https://stackoverflow.com/a/47390723 for a detailed description of this behavior. When generating code or schemas from an OAS with tools like takeshape.io having `type` attributes is important to get the correct behavior.
**What**
- Allows passing data on shipping methods during claim creation and updates. Defaults to an empty object.
**Testing**
- Updates a test so it also passes along shipping method data.
**What**
- Fixes wrong payload class for `POST /admin/shipping-profiles`
- Fixes wrong payload class for `POST /admin/shipping-profiles/:id`
- Fixes an issue where updating a shipping profile with products and/or shipping options would fail.
- Fixes an issue where passing `profile_id` to `ShippingOptionService.update()` would not update the shipping profile of the option.
**Testing**
- Adds new `simpleshippingProfileFactory`
- Adds new integration test suite for shipping profiles operations.
Resolves CORE-1065
What:
Products can be filtered through the API by category parameters
Why:
To filter products by category
How:
- adds 2 params in admin/store route
- updates repository to accept 2 new parameters
RESOLVES CORE-1032
RESOLVES CORE-1033
### What
Declare `x-codegen` in OAS for Admin routes - S to V.
### Why
We are introducing a new `x-codegen` OpenApi extension, also known as _vendor extension_, in order to help with passing information down to code generators.
In our case, we wish to declare the `method` name that we would expect to call on a client. This mimics our current JS client package.
E.g. `medusaClient.product.list` where `product` is the tag of the route and `list` is the x-codegen.method value.
We are also defining the name of a potential typed object for query parameters. OAS 3.0 does not allow to bundle query parameters under a single definition but it is not uncommon to see API clients handle all query parameters as a single typed object, like our JS client package. With x-codegen.queryParams, a code generator can create a named and typed object to bundle all query parameters for a given route.
E.g. `medusaClient.customer.retrieve(id: string, queryParams: AdminGetCustomerParams)`
### How
Declare `x-codegen` as an object with fields `method` and `queryParams` on all paths.
Match method and queryParams values with equivalent ones from our current JS client package.
### Test
* Ran OAS validator.
* Ran docs build script.
Expect no visible changes to the documentation.
### What
Declare `x-codegen` in OAS for Admin routes - PRO to R.
### Why
We are introducing a new `x-codegen` OpenApi extension, also known as _vendor extension_, in order to help with passing information down to code generators.
In our case, we wish to declare the `method` name that we would expect to call on a client. This mimics our current JS client package.
E.g. `medusaClient.product.list` where `product` is the tag of the route and `list` is the x-codegen.method value.
We are also defining the name of a potential typed object for query parameters. OAS 3.0 does not allow to bundle query parameters under a single definition but it is not uncommon to see API clients handle all query parameters as a single typed object, like our JS client package. With x-codegen.queryParams, a code generator can create a named and typed object to bundle all query parameters for a given route.
E.g. `medusaClient.customer.retrieve(id: string, queryParams: AdminGetCustomerParams)`
### How
Declare `x-codegen` as an object with fields `method` and `queryParams` on all paths.
Match method and queryParams values with equivalent ones from our current JS client package.
### Test
* Ran OAS validator.
* Ran docs build script.
Expect no visible changes to the documentation.
