### What
Add workflow for refreshing a payment collection.
The idea is that on all cart updates, we want two things to happen (in the context of payments) 1. the currently active payment sessions should be destroyed, and 2. the payment collection should be updated with the new cart total.
We do this to ensure that we always collect the correct payment amount.
From a customer perspective, this would mean that every time something on the cart is updated, the customer would need to enter their payment details anew.
To me, this is a good tradeoff to avoid inconsistencies with payment collection.
Additionally, I updated the Payment Module interface with `upsert` and `updated` following our established convention.
### Note
This PR depends on a fix to the `remoteJoiner` that @carlos-r-l-rodrigues is working on.
Update: Fix merged in #6602
Co-authored-by: Adrien de Peretti <25098370+adrien2p@users.noreply.github.com>
~~Opening a draft PR to discuss a couple of implementation details that we should align on~~
**What**
Add workflow and API endpoint for creating payment sessions for a payment collection. Endpoint is currently `POST /store/payment-collection/:id/payment-sessions`. I suggested an alternative in a comment below.
Please note, we intentionally do not want to support creating payment sessions in bulk, as this would become a mess when having to manage multiple calls to third-party providers.
what:
- when setting null for nullable columns, big number utils should not throw error
- remove circular soft delete depenedencies for cart module
- trims zeros on big number values
**What**
- Remove services that do not have any custom business and replace them with a simple interfaces
- Abstract module service provide the following base implementation
- retrieve
- list
- listAndCount
- delete
- softDelete
- restore
The above methods are created for the main model and also for each other models for which a config is provided
all method such as list, listAndCount, delete, softDelete and restore are pluralized with the model it refers to
**Migration**
- [x] product
- [x] pricing
- [x] promotion
- [x] cart
- [x] auth
- [x] customer
- [x] payment
- [x] Sales channel
- [x] Workflow-*
**Usage**
**Module**
The module service can now extend the ` ModulesSdkUtils.abstractModuleServiceFactory` which returns a class with the default implementation for each method and each model following the standard naming convention mentioned above.
This factory have 3 template arguments being the container, the main model DTO and an object representing the other model with a config object that contains at list the DTO and optionally a singular and plural property in case it needs to be set manually. It looks like the following:
```ts
export default class PricingModuleService</* ... */>
extends ModulesSdkUtils.abstractModuleServiceFactory<
InjectedDependencies,
PricingTypes.PriceSetDTO,
{
Currency: { dto: PricingTypes.CurrencyDTO }
MoneyAmount: { dto: PricingTypes.MoneyAmountDTO }
PriceSetMoneyAmount: { dto: PricingTypes.PriceSetMoneyAmountDTO }
PriceSetMoneyAmountRules: {
dto: PricingTypes.PriceSetMoneyAmountRulesDTO
}
PriceRule: { dto: PricingTypes.PriceRuleDTO }
RuleType: { dto: PricingTypes.RuleTypeDTO }
PriceList: { dto: PricingTypes.PriceListDTO }
PriceListRule: { dto: PricingTypes.PriceListRuleDTO }
}
>(PriceSet, generateMethodForModels, entityNameToLinkableKeysMap)
implements PricingTypes.IPricingModuleService
{
// ...
}
```
In the above, the singular and plural can be inferred as there is no tricky naming. Also, the default implementation does not remove the fact that you need to provides all the overloads etc in your module service interface. The above will provide a default implementation following the interface `AbstractModuleService` which is also auto generated, hence you will have the following methods available:
**for the main model**
- list
- retrieve
- listAndCount
- delete
- softDelete
- restore
**for the other models**
- list**MyModels**
- retrieve**MyModel**
- listAndCount**MyModels**
- delete**MyModels**
- softDelete**MyModels**
- restore**MyModels**
**Internal module service**
The internal module service can now extend `ModulesSdkUtils.internalModuleServiceFactory` which takes only one template argument which is the container type.
All internal services provides a default implementation for all retrieve, list, listAndCount, create, update, delete, softDelete, restore methods which follow the following interface `ModulesSdkTypes.InternalModuleService`:
```ts
export interface InternalModuleService<
TEntity extends {},
TContainer extends object = object
> {
get __container__(): TContainer
retrieve(
idOrObject: string,
config?: FindConfig<any>,
sharedContext?: Context
): Promise<TEntity>
retrieve(
idOrObject: object,
config?: FindConfig<any>,
sharedContext?: Context
): Promise<TEntity>
list(
filters?: FilterQuery<any> | BaseFilterable<FilterQuery<any>>,
config?: FindConfig<any>,
sharedContext?: Context
): Promise<TEntity[]>
listAndCount(
filters?: FilterQuery<any> | BaseFilterable<FilterQuery<any>>,
config?: FindConfig<any>,
sharedContext?: Context
): Promise<[TEntity[], number]>
create(data: any[], sharedContext?: Context): Promise<TEntity[]>
create(data: any, sharedContext?: Context): Promise<TEntity>
update(data: any[], sharedContext?: Context): Promise<TEntity[]>
update(data: any, sharedContext?: Context): Promise<TEntity>
update(
selectorAndData: {
selector: FilterQuery<any> | BaseFilterable<FilterQuery<any>>
data: any
},
sharedContext?: Context
): Promise<TEntity[]>
update(
selectorAndData: {
selector: FilterQuery<any> | BaseFilterable<FilterQuery<any>>
data: any
}[],
sharedContext?: Context
): Promise<TEntity[]>
delete(idOrSelector: string, sharedContext?: Context): Promise<void>
delete(idOrSelector: string[], sharedContext?: Context): Promise<void>
delete(idOrSelector: object, sharedContext?: Context): Promise<void>
delete(idOrSelector: object[], sharedContext?: Context): Promise<void>
delete(
idOrSelector: {
selector: FilterQuery<any> | BaseFilterable<FilterQuery<any>>
},
sharedContext?: Context
): Promise<void>
softDelete(
idsOrFilter: string[] | InternalFilterQuery,
sharedContext?: Context
): Promise<[TEntity[], Record<string, unknown[]>]>
restore(
idsOrFilter: string[] | InternalFilterQuery,
sharedContext?: Context
): Promise<[TEntity[], Record<string, unknown[]>]>
upsert(data: any[], sharedContext?: Context): Promise<TEntity[]>
upsert(data: any, sharedContext?: Context): Promise<TEntity>
}
```
When a service is auto generated you can use that interface to type your class property representing the expected internal service.
**Repositories**
The repositories can now extend `DALUtils.mikroOrmBaseRepositoryFactory` which takes one template argument being the entity or the template entity and provides all the default implementation. If the repository is auto generated you can type it using the `RepositoryService` interface. Here is the new interface typings.
```ts
export interface RepositoryService<T = any> extends BaseRepositoryService<T> {
find(options?: FindOptions<T>, context?: Context): Promise<T[]>
findAndCount(
options?: FindOptions<T>,
context?: Context
): Promise<[T[], number]>
create(data: any[], context?: Context): Promise<T[]>
// Becareful here, if you have a custom internal service, the update data should never be the entity otherwise
// both entity and update will point to the same ref and create issues with mikro orm
update(data: { entity; update }[], context?: Context): Promise<T[]>
delete(
idsOrPKs: FilterQuery<T> & BaseFilterable<FilterQuery<T>>,
context?: Context
): Promise<void>
/**
* Soft delete entities and cascade to related entities if configured.
*
* @param idsOrFilter
* @param context
*
* @returns [T[], Record<string, string[]>] the second value being the map of the entity names and ids that were soft deleted
*/
softDelete(
idsOrFilter: string[] | InternalFilterQuery,
context?: Context
): Promise<[T[], Record<string, unknown[]>]>
restore(
idsOrFilter: string[] | InternalFilterQuery,
context?: Context
): Promise<[T[], Record<string, unknown[]>]>
upsert(data: any[], context?: Context): Promise<T[]>
}
```
