* wip
* chore: prepare for PR
* move to end
* Change order of operations in refundPaymentWorkflow
Updated the order of operations in the refundPaymentWorkflow.
* chore: Add validation
When starting the Medusa application i see the following in the console:
```
update-order-tax-lines: "when" name should be defined. A random one will be assigned to it, which is not recommended for production.
({ input }) => {
return input.item_ids?.length > 0;
}
update-order-tax-lines: "when" name should be defined. A random one will be assigned to it, which is not recommended for production.
({ input }) => {
return input.shipping_method_ids?.length > 0;
}
```
This PR fixes the issue by passing a step name as a first parameter to the `when` usages in `updateOrderTaxLinesWorkflow`
**What**
- implement promotion usage limits per customer/email
- fix registering spend usage over the limit
- fix type errors in promotion module tests
**How**
- introduce a new type of campaign budget that can be defined by an attribute such as customer id or email
- add `CampaignBudgetUsage` entity to keep track of the number of uses per attribute value
- update `registerUsage` and `computeActions` in the promotion module to work with the new type
- update `core-flows` to pass context needed for usage calculation to the promotion module
**Breaking**
- registering promotion usage now throws (and cart complete fails) if the budget limit is exceeded or if the cart completion would result in a breached limit
---
CLOSES CORE-1172
CLOSES CORE-1173
CLOSES CORE-1174
CLOSES CORE-1175
Co-authored-by: Adrien de Peretti <25098370+adrien2p@users.noreply.github.com>
I added a lock in all workflows of the draft order. I don't think there are drawbacks and it will make sure we don't run into concurrency issues in with draft orders. I don't see why we would not add this in the order workflows, let me know and I can add it too.
I also didn't see any workflow that is long enough to justify adding a timeout of more than 2 seconds, but let me know if you think otherwise, we can discuss adjustments :)
CLOSES-1228
Closes#13163
I have a few questions about expected behaviour, since this currently breaks some tests:
- Many tests use the productModule to create products, with default status == "draft", and use the addToCart workflow which now throws. Should I change all breaking tests to specify status == "published" whne creating the product? The alternative would be to check the status in the store API route before the workflow but 1. it would be an extra query and 2. the addToCart workflow is only used in the store currently, and even if it was to be used admin-side, it still doesn't make sense to add a draft product to cart
- After this PR an unpublished product would give the same error as a variant that doesn't exist. While imho this is correct, the thrown error (for both) is "Items do not have a price" which doesn't make much sense(i believe the workflows goes through with an empty variants list and then errors at the price check point). Should I throw a different error when a variant doesn't exists/isn't published?
---
> [!NOTE]
> Enforces that only variants from published products can be added to carts, adds status fetching, refines errors, and updates tests to use ProductStatus.PUBLISHED.
>
> - **Core Flows**:
> - addToCart: Validate variants exist and belong to `product.status = PUBLISHED`; throw clear `INVALID_DATA` when not found/unpublished.
> - Data fetching: Include `product.status` in `cart` and `order` variant field selections.
> - **Tests/Fixtures**:
> - Update integration tests to set `status: ProductStatus.PUBLISHED` when creating products and import `ProductStatus` where needed.
> - Add cases for unpublished products and non-existent variants producing the new error message.
>
> <sup>Written by [Cursor Bugbot](https://cursor.com/dashboard?tab=bugbot) for commit ca72532e957964d2d8e6bcecbb0905054c677ded. This will update automatically on new commits. Configure [here](https://cursor.com/dashboard?tab=bugbot).</sup>
RESOLVES CORE-1153
**What**
- This pr mainly lay the foundation the caching layer. It comes with a modules (built in memory cache) and a redis provider.
- Apply caching to few touch point to test
Co-authored-by: Carlos R. L. Rodrigues <37986729+carlos-r-l-rodrigues@users.noreply.github.com>
RESOLVES CORE-1204
**What**
- Fix wrong price tier when multiple items are targetting the same variant
- fix type import from the wrong package
**Notes**
If you are struggling navigating the changes, you can focus on the following files:
```
integration-tests/http/__tests__/cart/store/cart.spec.ts
integration-tests/modules/__tests__/cart/store/cart.workflows.spec.ts
packages/core/core-flows/src/cart/steps/get-promotion-codes-to-apply.ts
packages/core/core-flows/src/cart/steps/get-variant-price-sets.ts
packages/core/core-flows/src/cart/workflows/add-to-cart.ts
packages/core/core-flows/src/cart/workflows/create-carts.ts
packages/core/core-flows/src/cart/workflows/get-variants-and-items-with-prices.ts
packages/core/core-flows/src/cart/workflows/refresh-cart-items.ts
packages/core/core-flows/src/order/workflows/add-line-items.ts
packages/core/core-flows/src/order/workflows/create-order.ts
```
**What**
- add InfiniteList on location selection for inventory level -> fixes issue with location pagination
- fix removal of location level for an inventory item
- refresh the levels table when locations are updated
- add search input for filtering locations
---
CLOSES CORE-1208
cc @willbouch since you asked to be tagged if I opened this PR.
The /store/shipping-options is one of only 2 store endpoints to not allow custom `fields` to be passed(other one is /store/returns if you guys want to add it to the backlog). This PR fixes that so that custom linked models can also be retrieved.
Note: This fix reveals a bug in the next.js starter
eac359cc8d/src/lib/data/fulfillment.ts (L23-L24)
`fields` was previously ignored, now it errors since it tries to parse the misspelled "fulfllment"(the i is missing). It worked before since both fields are already defined by default inside the workflow. So the `fields` line is totally redundant and should be removed(ideally before merging this).
Maybe in the next release notes it should also warn users to remove it for those that already have a modified copy of the starter.
* fix(utils,core-flows): subtotal calculation and returns location
* changeset
* fix test
* var
* rm extra field from test
* fix original total
* fix partial refunds and pending difference
* fix test
* fix test
* test
* extract to util
* original total and update payment when receive return
* original_subtotal
* default fields
* test
* calculate pending difference
* revert claims test
* pending difference
* creadit line fix
* if
* feat(core-flows): add hook to set shipping option context when listing them
* changeset
* add integration test
* add it to other workflow
* missing hook in workflow response
* rework workflow
* rework workflow
* typing issue
* comment from oli
* cursor the goat
* tests
* save lines
* move code around
* missing additional params in many places
* smal fix
* smal fix
RESOLVES CORE-1155
**What**
- prevent update payment collection worklow to fetch data and call steps when there is no payment collection
- prevent refresh Cart Shipping Methods Workflow to fetch data and call steps when there is no shipping methods
- update promotion step to remove extraneous module call
**What**
- don't cascade delete shipping option type when shipping option is deleted since types can be shared between options
- prevent shipping option type deletion if there are options associated with it
* feat(dashboard,core,modules): free shipping promotion in dashboard
* self-review
* adapt for edit to work
* changeset
* integration tests
* across for each
* remove only from tests
* remove console log
* revert to across
* update wording for shipping promotions
* modify changeset
* suggestion frane
* fix i18n schema
**What**
- handle single inventory items with `required_quantity > 1` correctly in the allocate UI flow
- display correct availability amount in the create fulullment form for inventory kit items
- fix check in the create fulfillment flow that would allow negative reservation because `required_quantity` wasn't included in the check
- show the most recent reservations first in the reservations table
- display an error in the allocation form if a reservation is not created for some inventory items
- display inventory kit in the order summary if the product has multiple same inventory items
---
CLOSES SUP-1655
* feat(dashboard, core-flows): allow associating shipping option type to a shipping option
* edit as well
* fix translation schema
* fix some tests
* changeset
* add new test to update shipping option type
* add new test to create shipping option with shipping option type
* pr comments
* pr comments
* rename variable
* make zod great again
* fix: handle missing variants and preserve zero unit_price in prepareLineItems
Fixed two issues in prepareLineItems:
1. unit_price value of 0 was previously treated as falsy and overwritten with the variant's price. Updated the check to only fallback when unitPrice is null or undefined.
2. When no variants array was provided, the code could throw due to non-null assertions. Now safely handles missing or empty variants.
Additional adjustments:
- Replaced `||` with `??` for array defaults to preserve valid empty arrays.
- Kept changes minimal to avoid altering function signature.
* Create sweet-wasps-build.md
* Update add-line-items.ts
* Update packages/core/core-flows/src/order/workflows/add-line-items.ts
Co-authored-by: Oli Juhl <59018053+olivermrbl@users.noreply.github.com>
* Update packages/core/core-flows/src/order/workflows/create-order.ts
Co-authored-by: Oli Juhl <59018053+olivermrbl@users.noreply.github.com>
---------
Co-authored-by: Carlos R. L. Rodrigues <37986729+carlos-r-l-rodrigues@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Oli Juhl <59018053+olivermrbl@users.noreply.github.com>
This is part of a set of stacked PRs to add support for view configurations, which will allow users to customize the columns shown in admin tables.
The functionality in this PR is behind the view_configuration feature flag.
**What**
- Adds an API to introspect the remote query schema and extract columns that users can add to their table views.
**Notes**
- This is a brute forced approach to get the functionality in place and I expect it to evolve to something more elegant over time. Some ideas for things we might want to consider:
- Compute the entity columns during build time and store as static data the API can serve quickly.
- Offer developers more control over how their data can be exposed in this API with additional decorators in the DML.
