* feat(): Translation first steps
* feat(): locale middleware
* feat(): readonly links
* feat(): feature flag
* feat(): modules sdk
* feat(): translation module re export
* start adding workflows
* update typings
* update typings
* test(): Add integration tests
* test(): centralize filters preparation
* test(): centralize filters preparation
* remove unnecessary importy
* fix workflows
* Define StoreLocale inside Store Module
* Link definition to extend Store with supported_locales
* store_locale migration
* Add supported_locales handling in Store Module
* Tests
* Accept supported_locales in Store endpoints
* Add locales to js-sdk
* Include locale list and default locale in Store Detail section
* Initialize local namespace in js-sdk
* Add locales route
* Make code primary key of locale table to facilitate upserts
* Add locales routes
* Show locale code as is
* Add list translations api route
* Batch endpoint
* Types
* New batchTranslationsWorkflow and various updates to existent ones
* Edit default locale UI
* WIP
* Apply translation agnostically
* middleware
* Apply translation agnostically
* fix Apply translation agnostically
* apply translations to product list
* Add feature flag
* fetch translations by batches of 250 max
* fix apply
* improve and test util
* apply to product list
* dont manage translations if no locale
* normalize locale
* potential todo
* Protect translations routes with feature flag
* Extract normalize locale util to core/utils
* Normalize locale on write
* Normalize locale for read
* Use feature flag to guard translations UI across the board
* Avoid throwing incorrectly when locale_code not present in partial updates
* move applyTranslations util
* remove old tests
* fix util tests
* fix(): product end points
* cleanup
* update lock
* remove unused var
* cleanup
* fix apply locale
* missing new dep for test utils
* Change entity_type, entity_id to reference, reference_id
* Remove comment
* Avoid registering translations route if ff not enabled
* Prevent registering express handler for disabled route via defineFileConfig
* Add tests
* Add changeset
* Update test
* fix integration tests, module and internals
* Add locale id plus fixed
* Allow to pass array of reference_id
* fix unit tests
* fix link loading
* fix store route
* fix sales channel test
* fix tests
---------
Co-authored-by: Nicolas Gorga <nicogorga11@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Oli Juhl <59018053+olivermrbl@users.noreply.github.com>
**What**
This PR introduces experimental Hot Module Replacement (HMR) for the Medusa backend, enabling developers to see code changes reflected immediately without restarting the server. This significantly improves the development experience by reducing iteration time.
### Key Features
- Hot reload support for:
- API Routes
- Workflows & Steps
- Scheduled Jobs
- Event Subscribers
- Modules
- IPC-based architecture: The dev server runs in a child process, communicating with the parent watcher via IPC. When HMR fails, the child process is killed and restarted, ensuring
clean resource cleanup.
- Recovery mechanism: Automatically recovers from broken module states without manual intervention.
- Graceful fallback: When HMR cannot handle a change (e.g., medusa-config.ts, .env), the server restarts completely.
### Architecture
```mermaid
flowchart TB
subgraph Parent["develop.ts (File Watcher)"]
W[Watch Files]
end
subgraph Child["start.ts (HTTP Server)"]
R[reloadResources]
R --> MR[ModuleReloader]
R --> WR[WorkflowReloader]
R --> RR[RouteReloader]
R --> SR[SubscriberReloader]
R --> JR[JobReloader]
end
W -->|"hmr-reload"| R
R -->|"hmr-result"| W
```
### How to enable it
Backend HMR is behind a feature flag. Enable it by setting:
```ts
// medusa-config.ts
module.exports = defineConfig({
featureFlags: {
backend_hmr: true
}
})
```
or
```bash
export MEDUSA_FF_BACKEND_HMR=true
```
or
```
// .env
MEDUSA_FF_BACKEND_HMR=true
```
Co-authored-by: Oli Juhl <59018053+olivermrbl@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Carlos R. L. Rodrigues <37986729+carlos-r-l-rodrigues@users.noreply.github.com>
* chore(): Run some commands in server mode only
* Create orange-timers-lay.md
* chore(): Run some commands in server mode only
* chore(): Run some commands in server mode only
* chore(): Run some commands in server mode only
> [!NOTE]
> Adds a configurable concurrency for link migrations (CLI/commands), forces concurrency=1 when pgstream is detected, and ignores duplicate link-table inserts.
>
> - **CLI**
> - Add `--concurrency` option to `db:migrate` and `db:sync-links`.
> - **Medusa commands**
> - `migrate` and `sync-links` accept `concurrency`; set `DB_MIGRATION_CONCURRENCY` and force `1` when `pgstream` schema exists via new `isPgstreamEnabled`.
> - **Link Modules (migrations)**
> - Execute plan actions with `executeWithConcurrency` using `DB_MIGRATION_CONCURRENCY`.
> - Make link-table tracking inserts idempotent with `ON CONFLICT DO NOTHING` (including bulk/upsert and per-create).
>
> <sup>Written by [Cursor Bugbot](https://cursor.com/dashboard?tab=bugbot) for commit 07432293c8fe8de30b07920fa47823b9081edacc. This will update automatically on new commits. Configure [here](https://cursor.com/dashboard?tab=bugbot).</sup>
* fix(): event emitting
* Create rude-queens-deny.md
* fix(): store subscriber should not be constraint
* Update rude-queens-deny.md
* Add tests to prevent regression
## Summary
**What** — What changes are introduced in this PR?
- Add HTTP type for update order API route payload + use it in the JS SDK and API route
- other: add `since` tag
**Why** — Why are these changes relevant or necessary?
*Please provide answer here*
**How** — How have these changes been implemented?
*Please provide answer here*
**Testing** — How have these changes been tested, or how can the reviewer test the feature?
*Please provide answer here*
---
## Examples
Provide examples or code snippets that demonstrate how this feature works, or how it can be used in practice.
This helps with documentation and ensures maintainers can quickly understand and verify the change.
```ts
// Example usage
```
---
## Checklist
Please ensure the following before requesting a review:
- [ ] I have added a **changeset** for this PR
- Every non-breaking change should be marked as a **patch**
- To add a changeset, run `yarn changeset` and follow the prompts
- [ ] The changes are covered by relevant **tests**
- [ ] I have verified the code works as intended locally
- [ ] I have linked the related issue(s) if applicable
---
## Additional Context
Add any additional context, related issues, or references that might help the reviewer understand this PR.
* feat: carry over promotions toggle on exchanges
* fix: inital flag value, return the flag on preview
* fix: validation of allocation type
* fix: revert client changes
* fix: invert condition
* feat: recompute adjustments when outbound item is updated
* fix: condition again
* fix: display more accurate inbound/outbound totals for exchanges
* fix: make exchanges specs green
* feat: more testing cases
* wip: pr feedback
* fix: use plural for the flag on Admin
* fix: schema test, route refactor
* feat: tooltip
* feat: refactor to use update workflow
* feat: display applied promotion per item on order details, show copy sku on hover
* feat: refactor edits and exchanges to have common flag toggle flow
* fix: delete empty file
* fix: exchange_id param query
FIXES https://github.com/medusajs/medusa/issues/13976
**What**
Before applying the sales channel link filter, check if there is a single sales channel or many, if will add a bit of overhead but marginal compare to the improvement for big catalog with single sales channel
---
> [!NOTE]
> Optimizes store products listing by conditionally skipping sales channel link filtering when the index can be used or only one sales channel exists.
>
> - **Store API – `products`** (`packages/medusa/src/api/store/products/middlewares.ts`):
> - Adds `applyMaybeLinkFilterIfNecessary` middleware:
> - Skips link filtering when `IndexEngine` is enabled and no tag/category filters are present.
> - Queries `sales_channels` count; if only one exists, removes `sales_channel_id` filter and proceeds.
> - Integrates this middleware into `GET /store/products` before default filters; `GET /store/products/:id` remains unchanged with `maybeApplyLinkFilter`.
> - **Release**:
> - Adds patch changeset for `@medusajs/medusa`.
>
> <sup>Written by [Cursor Bugbot](https://cursor.com/dashboard?tab=bugbot) for commit 8a0b024ea1bc9696f350f34fa77df321e5ecf553. This will update automatically on new commits. Configure [here](https://cursor.com/dashboard?tab=bugbot).</sup>
* wip
* add wip
* wip
* reuse action
* finish first draft
* fix tests
* cleanup
* Only compute adjustments when necessary
* Create hot-carrots-look.md
* address comments
* minor tweaks
* fix pay col
* fix test
* wip
* Dwip
* wip
* fix: adjustment typo
* fix: import
* fix: workflow imports
* wip: update test
* feat: upsert versioned adjustments when previewing order
* fix: revert unique codes change
* fix: order spec test with versioning
* wip: save
* feat: make adjustments work for preview and confirm flow, wip base repo filtering of older version adjustments
* fix: missing populate where
* wip: populate where loading versioned adjustments
* fix: filter out older adjustment versions
* temp: comment adjustments in repo
* test: add adjustment if no version
* wip: configure populate where in order base repository
* fix: rm manual filtering
* fix: revert base repo changes
* fix: revert
* fix: use order item version instead of order version
* fix: rm only in test
* fix: update case spec
* fix: remove sceanrio, wip test with draft promotion
* feat: test correct adjustments when disabling promotion
* feat: complex test case
* feat: test consecutive order edits
* feat: 2 promotions test case with a fixed promo
* feat: migrate existing order line item adjustments to order items latest version
* feat: update dep after merge
* wip: load adjustments separatley
* feat: adjustments collections
* fix: spread result, handle related entity case
* fix: update lock
* feat: make sure version is loaded, refactor, handle related entity case
* fix: check fields
* feat: loading adjustments for list and count
* fix: correct items version field
* fix: rm empty array
* fix: wip order modules spec
* fix: order module specs
* feat: preinit items adjustments
* fix: rm only
* fix: rm only
* chore: cleanup
* fix: migration files
* fix: dont change formatting
* fix: core package build
* chore: more cleanup
* fix: item update util
* fix: duplicate import
* fix: refresh adjustments for exchanges (#13992)
* wip: exchange adjustments
* feat: test - receive items
* feat: finish test case
* fix: casing
* fix(draft-orders, core-flows, orders) refresh adjustments for draft orders (#14025)
* wip: draft orders adjustments refresh
* feat: rewrite to use REPLACE action + test
* fix: rm only
* feat: cleanup old REPLACE actions
* feat: cleanup adjustemnts when 0 promotions
* wip: canceling draft order
* fix: make version arg optional
* fix: restore promotion links
* feat: test reverting on cancelation
* fix: address comments in tests
* wip: fix summary on preview
* fix: get pending diff on preview summary from total
* fix: revert pending diff change
---------
Co-authored-by: fPolic <mainacc.polic@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Frane Polić <16856471+fPolic@users.noreply.github.com>
* Add preprocess to version param to validate as number
* Add changeset
* Use the first version of the order as the starting node of activity to show correct total
* Add changeset
* Fetch first order version only if it's not the current version
* Remove conditionally rendered hook, use enable config
## Summary
**What** — What changes are introduced in this PR?
Use correct HTTP type parameter for the get claim API route
**Why** — Why are these changes relevant or necessary?
*Please provide answer here*
**How** — How have these changes been implemented?
*Please provide answer here*
**Testing** — How have these changes been tested, or how can the reviewer test the feature?
*Please provide answer here*
---
## Examples
Provide examples or code snippets that demonstrate how this feature works, or how it can be used in practice.
This helps with documentation and ensures maintainers can quickly understand and verify the change.
```ts
// Example usage
```
---
## Checklist
Please ensure the following before requesting a review:
- [ ] I have added a **changeset** for this PR
- Every non-breaking change should be marked as a **patch**
- To add a changeset, run `yarn changeset` and follow the prompts
- [ ] The changes are covered by relevant **tests**
- [ ] I have verified the code works as intended locally
- [ ] I have linked the related issue(s) if applicable
---
## Additional Context
Add any additional context, related issues, or references that might help the reviewer understand this PR.
## Summary
**What** — What changes are introduced in this PR?
Allow users to delete other users and prevent them from deleting themselves.
**Why** — Why are these changes relevant or necessary?
Inability to delete other users causes old users that maybe don't work anymore with the business to have access still.
**How** — How have these changes been implemented?
Inverted the check in the admin delete user endpoint, to allow users deleting other users but themselves.
**Testing** — How have these changes been tested, or how can the reviewer test the feature?
Integration tests
---
## Examples
Provide examples or code snippets that demonstrate how this feature works, or how it can be used in practice.
This helps with documentation and ensures maintainers can quickly understand and verify the change.
```ts
// Example usage
```
---
## Checklist
Please ensure the following before requesting a review:
- [x] I have added a **changeset** for this PR
- Every non-breaking change should be marked as a **patch**
- To add a changeset, run `yarn changeset` and follow the prompts
- [x] The changes are covered by relevant **tests**
- [x] I have verified the code works as intended locally
- [x] I have linked the related issue(s) if applicable
---
## Additional Context
Add any additional context, related issues, or references that might help the reviewer understand this PR.
closes OPS-97
---
> [!NOTE]
> Enables deleting other users via admin DELETE endpoint while blocking self-deletion, with corresponding integration tests and changeset.
>
> - **Backend**
> - Update `DELETE /admin/users/:id` in `packages/medusa/src/api/admin/users/[id]/route.ts`:
> - Disallow self-deletion when `actor_id === id` with `NOT_ALLOWED` error.
> - Execute `removeUserAccountWorkflow` and return standard delete response.
> - **Tests**
> - Expand `integration-tests/http/__tests__/user/admin/user.spec.ts`:
> - Create a second admin user; delete it and verify auth identity `app_metadata` no longer includes `user_id`.
> - Confirm token still authenticates but access is revoked (401 on `/admin/users/me`).
> - Assert self-deletion returns 400 with message `"A user cannot delete itself"`.
> - **Changeset**
> - Add `.changeset/dull-plants-create.md` (patch for `@medusajs/medusa`).
>
> <sup>Written by [Cursor Bugbot](https://cursor.com/dashboard?tab=bugbot) for commit f1f8252b91593b8a8fb03dc9d26460d09a10cfaa. This will update automatically on new commits. Configure [here](https://cursor.com/dashboard?tab=bugbot).</sup>
## Summary
**What** — What changes are introduced in this PR?
- Fix validators of delete item action for exchanges and claims to not include filter fields (their routes don't use these filters, and it doesn't make sense to have them)
- Fix query parameter type argument of the create reservation route to the correct HTTP type.
- Fix the HTTP type used for listing products and shipping options in the storefront to not include the `with_deleted` (It's also not supported by their validators)
**Why** — Why are these changes relevant or necessary?
*Please provide answer here*
**How** — How have these changes been implemented?
*Please provide answer here*
**Testing** — How have these changes been tested, or how can the reviewer test the feature?
*Please provide answer here*
---
## Examples
Provide examples or code snippets that demonstrate how this feature works, or how it can be used in practice.
This helps with documentation and ensures maintainers can quickly understand and verify the change.
```ts
// Example usage
```
---
## Checklist
Please ensure the following before requesting a review:
- [ ] I have added a **changeset** for this PR
- Every non-breaking change should be marked as a **patch**
- To add a changeset, run `yarn changeset` and follow the prompts
- [ ] The changes are covered by relevant **tests**
- [ ] I have verified the code works as intended locally
- [ ] I have linked the related issue(s) if applicable
---
## Additional Context
Add any additional context, related issues, or references that might help the reviewer understand this PR.
* chore(): Cleanup and organize deps
* chore(): Cleanup and organize deps
* chore(): Cleanup and organize deps
* chore(): Cleanup and organize deps
* chore(): Cleanup and organize deps
* chore(): Cleanup and organize deps
* Create lucky-poets-scream.md
* chore(): Cleanup and organize deps
* chore(): Cleanup and organize deps
* chore(): Cleanup and organize deps
* chore(): Cleanup and organize deps
* dedupe snapshot this build
* split into 4 shard
* re configure packages integration tests
* re configure packages integration tests
* re configure packages integration tests
* re configure packages integration tests
* update scripts
* update scripts
* update scripts
* update scripts
* update scripts
* update scripts
* update scripts
* update scripts
* reduce shard for packages
* feat(index): Add support to trigger sync manually
* feat(index): Add API route to interact with
* feat(index): Add API route to interact with
* feat(index): Add API route to interact with
* test(): Add http integration tests
* Create weak-elephants-reply.md
## Summary
**What** — What changes are introduced in this PR?
This PR is part of a series of PRs to fix HTTP and request type arguments.
This is the last PR in the series. It includes a changeset for the changes made.
**Why** — Why are these changes relevant or necessary?
These types impact the outputted OAS which we show on the API reference. By fixing up the types, we ensure accurate request parameters in the API reference.
**How** — How have these changes been implemented?
Made changes to HTTP types and request type arguments
**Testing** — How have these changes been tested, or how can the reviewer test the feature?
-
---
## Examples
-
---
## Checklist
Please ensure the following before requesting a review:
- [ ] I have added a **changeset** for this PR
- Every non-breaking change should be marked as a **patch**
- To add a changeset, run `yarn changeset` and follow the prompts
- [ ] The changes are covered by relevant **tests**
- [ ] I have verified the code works as intended locally
- [ ] I have linked the related issue(s) if applicable
---
## Additional Context
-
Nicolas GorgaandGitHub
olivermrbl
Shahed NasserandGitHub
