**What**
- if a cart contains variants that share inventory items, reservation of the item would fail also causing complete cart to fail
- include `completed_at` when compensating cart update
- account for multiple reservations of the same item when creating the locking key
---
CLOSES SUP-587
- Fixed missing `shipping_profile_id` field in product creation request, which caused "Invalid request: Field 'shipping_profile_id' is required" errors.
- Updated the request payload to include `shipping_profile_id`.
- Edited documentation to reflect this change.
What:
- `query.index` helper. It queries the index module, and aggregate the rest of requested fields/relations if needed like `query.graph`.
Not covered in this PR:
- Hydrate only sub entities returned by the query. Example: 1 out of 5 variants have returned, it should only hydrate the data of the single entity, currently it will merge all the variants of the product.
- Generate types of indexed data
example:
```ts
const query = container.resolve(ContainerRegistrationKeys.QUERY)
await query.index({
entity: "product",
fields: [
"id",
"description",
"status",
"variants.sku",
"variants.barcode",
"variants.material",
"variants.options.value",
"variants.prices.amount",
"variants.prices.currency_code",
"variants.inventory_items.inventory.sku",
"variants.inventory_items.inventory.description",
],
filters: {
"variants.sku": { $like: "%-1" },
"variants.prices.amount": { $gt: 30 },
},
pagination: {
order: {
"variants.prices.amount": "DESC",
},
},
})
```
This query return all products where at least one variant has the title ending in `-1` and at least one price bigger than `30`.
The Index Module only hold the data used to paginate and filter, and the returned object is:
```json
{
"id": "prod_01JKEAM2GJZ14K64R0DHK0JE72",
"title": null,
"variants": [
{
"id": "variant_01JKEAM2HC89GWS95F6GF9C6YA",
"sku": "extra-variant-1",
"prices": [
{
"id": "price_01JKEAM2JADEWWX72F8QDP6QXT",
"amount": 80,
"currency_code": "USD"
}
]
}
]
}
```
All the rest of the fields will be hydrated from their respective modules, and the final result will be:
```json
{
"id": "prod_01JKEAY2RJTF8TW9A23KTGY1GD",
"description": "extra description",
"status": "draft",
"variants": [
{
"sku": "extra-variant-1",
"barcode": null,
"material": null,
"id": "variant_01JKEAY2S945CRZ6X4QZJ7GVBJ",
"options": [
{
"value": "Red"
}
],
"prices": [
{
"amount": 20,
"currency_code": "CAD",
"id": "price_01JKEAY2T2EEYSWZHPGG11B7W7"
},
{
"amount": 80,
"currency_code": "USD",
"id": "price_01JKEAY2T2NJK2E5468RK84CAR"
}
],
"inventory_items": [
{
"variant_id": "variant_01JKEAY2S945CRZ6X4QZJ7GVBJ",
"inventory_item_id": "iitem_01JKEAY2SNY2AWEHPZN0DDXVW6",
"inventory": {
"sku": "extra-variant-1",
"description": "extra variant 1",
"id": "iitem_01JKEAY2SNY2AWEHPZN0DDXVW6"
}
}
]
}
]
}
```
Co-authored-by: Adrien de Peretti <25098370+adrien2p@users.noreply.github.com>
**What**
In order to prevent multiple version to exists and that might not be compatible with one another, we fix the zod package version in the admin-sdk in complement to the starter
**What**
- Bumps the versions of Vite across the entire stack, to prevent an issue similar to what is described here: https://github.com/vitejs/vite/discussions/18271
Not entirely sure what was happening as I couldn't reproduce the issue, but Adrien faced the issue yesterday when working with local versions of our packages. It does appear as if the range we had before could lead to a version of Vite to be installed with said bug.
**What**
Fix linkable generation when there is no dml models and models are provided as virtual to the joiner config and therefore the linkable are inferred
This PR adds a couple new statuses to the payment collection and payment webhook results. The payment collection will now be marked as "completed" once the captured amount is the full amount of the payment collection.
There are several things left to improve the payment setup, so non-happy-path cases are handled correctly.
1. Currently the payment session and payment models serve a very similar purpose. Part of the information is found on one, and the other part on the other model, without any clear reason for doing so. We can simplify the payment module and the data models simply by merging the two.
2. We need to handle failures more gracefully, such as setting the payment session status to failed when such a webhook comes in.
3. We should convert the payment collection status and the different amounts to calculated fields from the payment session, captures, and refunds, as they can easily be a source of inconsistencies.
**Why**
- if pending difference is lass then the rounding threshold for currency the page would show for example "Refund -0.00$"
**What**
- example: hide the refund button if the pending difference in USD is -0.004
- example: show refund button if pending difference on USD is -0.007
---
CLOSES SUP-811
CLOSES https://github.com/medusajs/medusa/issues/11331
