* feat(medusa): Cleanup swap creation flow
* revert test and package
* fix unit tests
* fix swap seeder that does not include the tax lines on the return line item
---------
Co-authored-by: Oliver Windall Juhl <59018053+olivermrbl@users.noreply.github.com>
What:
Assign the default sales channel if none is provided while creating a new product.
FIXES: CORE-1114
Co-authored-by: Oliver Windall Juhl <59018053+olivermrbl@users.noreply.github.com>
### Scope
Models R to U
### What
Refactor OAS for models to accurately represent their shape in API responses.
### Why
About 33% of model fields are not accurately represented in the OAS. Most of the issues are:
- fields that can not be omitted in the response are not declared as `required`
- fields that could return `null` as their value are not declared as `nullable: true`
When using a code generator, these OAS issues would lead to inaccurate response shapes in the generated client.
### How
#### nullable
Fields meeting at least one of the following condition will be represented as `nullable: true` in OAS:
* The field is decorated with `@Column({ nullable: true })`
* The field is decorated with `@OneToOne`, `@ManyToOne`
* The field is decorated with `@DeleteDateColumn`
#### optional
Fields meeting at least one of the following conditions will never be listed as `required` in OAS and will be considered optional and could be omitted in the response:
* The field is decorated with `@OneToOne`, `@ManyToOne`, `@OneToMany`, `@ManyToMany`
* The field is decorated with `@FeatureFlagColumn`
* The field is decorated with `@Column({select: false})`
* The field is representing dynamic values not persisted in the database
Fields not meeting any of the conditions above will be declared as `required` and are expected to be present in the response.
### Test
* Ran OAS validator.
* Ran docs build script.
Expect OAS changes to be reflected in the API documentation.
### Scope
Models PA to PU
### What
Refactor OAS for models to accurately represent their shape in API responses.
### Why
About 33% of model fields are not accurately represented in the OAS. Most of the issues are:
- fields that can not be omitted in the response are not declared as `required`
- fields that could return `null` as their value are not declared as `nullable: true`
When using a code generator, these OAS issues would lead to inaccurate response shapes in the generated client.
### How
#### nullable
Fields meeting at least one of the following condition will be represented as `nullable: true` in OAS:
* The field is decorated with `@Column({ nullable: true })`
* The field is decorated with `@OneToOne`, `@ManyToOne`
* The field is decorated with `@DeleteDateColumn`
#### optional
Fields meeting at least one of the following conditions will never be listed as `required` in OAS and will be considered optional and could be omitted in the response:
* The field is decorated with `@OneToOne`, `@ManyToOne`, `@OneToMany`, `@ManyToMany`
* The field is decorated with `@FeatureFlagColumn`
* The field is decorated with `@Column({select: false})`
* The field is representing dynamic values not persisted in the database
Fields not meeting any of the conditions above will be declared as `required` and are expected to be present in the response.
### Test
* Ran OAS validator.
* Ran docs build script.
Expect OAS changes to be reflected in the API documentation.
### Scope
Models F to O
### What
Refactor OAS for models to accurately represent their shape in API responses.
### Why
About 33% of model fields are not accurately represented in the OAS. Most of the issues are:
- fields that can not be omitted in the response are not declared as `required`
- fields that could return `null` as their value are not declared as `nullable: true`
When using a code generator, these OAS issues would lead to inaccurate response shapes in the generated client.
### How
#### nullable
Fields meeting at least one of the following condition will be represented as `nullable: true` in OAS:
* The field is decorated with `@Column({ nullable: true })`
* The field is decorated with `@OneToOne`, `@ManyToOne`
* The field is decorated with `@DeleteDateColumn`
#### optional
Fields meeting at least one of the following conditions will never be listed as `required` in OAS and will be considered optional and could be omitted in the response:
* The field is decorated with `@OneToOne`, `@ManyToOne`, `@OneToMany`, `@ManyToMany`
* The field is decorated with `@FeatureFlagColumn`
* The field is decorated with `@Column({select: false})`
* The field is representing dynamic values not persisted in the database
Fields not meeting any of the conditions above will be declared as `required` and are expected to be present in the response.
### Test
* Ran OAS validator.
* Ran docs build script.
Expect OAS changes to be reflected in the API documentation.
### Scope
Models A to D
### What
Refactor OAS for models to accurately represent their shape in API responses.
### Why
About 33% of model fields are not accurately represented in the OAS. Most of the issues are:
- fields that can not be omitted in the response are not declared as `required`
- fields that could return `null` as their value are not declared as `nullable: true`
When using a code generator, these OAS issues would lead to inaccurate response shapes in the generated client.
### How
#### nullable
Fields meeting at least one of the following condition will be represented as `nullable: true` in OAS:
* The field is decorated with `@Column({ nullable: true })`
* The field is decorated with `@OneToOne`, `@ManyToOne`
* The field is decorated with `@DeleteDateColumn`
#### optional
Fields meeting at least one of the following conditions will never be listed as `required` in OAS and will be considered optional and could be omitted in the response:
* The field is decorated with `@OneToOne`, `@ManyToOne`, `@OneToMany`, `@ManyToMany`
* The field is decorated with `@FeatureFlagColumn`
* The field is decorated with `@Column({select: false})`
* The field is representing dynamic values not persisted in the database
Fields not meeting any of the conditions above will be declared as `required` and are expected to be present in the response.
### Test
* Ran OAS validator.
* Ran docs build script.
Expect OAS changes to be reflected in the API documentation.
This PR improves the OAS by adding `type: object` to schemas that have `properties` and no `type`. While this attribute is not required for a valid spec, omitting it opens the possibilities of non-object input. See https://stackoverflow.com/a/47390723 for a detailed description of this behavior. When generating code or schemas from an OAS with tools like takeshape.io having `type` attributes is important to get the correct behavior.
### What
Add OAS build step to patch known circular references that prevent Redocly from rendering the API documentation.
### Why
We've encountered crashing and loading issues with Redocly when the OAS contained circular references. We have been working around the limitation by omitting some known problematic $ref in our source OAS. We wish to move away from this strategy in order to always explicitly include $ref in our OAS.
### How
We are introducing a custom Redocly CLI plugin that will replace `$ref` by `type: object` base on a configurable set of instructions. These instructions can be modified in `docs-util/redocly/config.yaml`
We are adding a `redocly bundle` step in the current OAS build process in order to sanitize problematic circular references.
We updated the redocly-cli package version in order to ensure that plugins are supported.
### Test
We will use [Cart.payment](fd5c185159/packages/medusa/src/models/cart.ts (L72-L74)) to ensure that the new process is properly sanitizing.
* Run `yarn openapi:generate`
* Open `docs/api/store/components/schemas/Cart.yaml`
* Expect the `payment` property to have been sanitized to `type: object`
* Run `yarn redocly preview-docs docs/api/store/openapi.yaml --config=docs-util/redocly/config.yaml`
* Visit http://127.0.0.1:8080/#tag/Cart/operation/GetCartsCart
* In the response, expect cart.payment to not list the properties of the Payment schema.
**What**
- Allows passing data on shipping methods during claim creation and updates. Defaults to an empty object.
**Testing**
- Updates a test so it also passes along shipping method data.
**What**
- Fixes wrong payload class for `POST /admin/shipping-profiles`
- Fixes wrong payload class for `POST /admin/shipping-profiles/:id`
- Fixes an issue where updating a shipping profile with products and/or shipping options would fail.
- Fixes an issue where passing `profile_id` to `ShippingOptionService.update()` would not update the shipping profile of the option.
**Testing**
- Adds new `simpleshippingProfileFactory`
- Adds new integration test suite for shipping profiles operations.
Resolves CORE-1065
